City
Epaper

Delhi HC quashes FIR for outraging woman's modesty, orders man to assist Traffic Police for a month as settlement

By IANS | Updated: April 24, 2024 20:45 IST

New Delhi, April 24 The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR filed against a man accused of ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 24 The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR filed against a man accused of outraging the modesty of a woman, following an amicable settlement between the parties, and as part of the pact, ordered the man to assist the traffic police at a designated traffic signal for 30 days.

Failure to comply with this order will result in further court action, Justice Navin Chawla said while recently dismissing charges under Sections 354, 506, and 509 of the Indian Penal Code after being informed of the settlement.

"Keeping in view the fact that the respondent no 2 (the complainant woman) does not wish to pursue her complaint any further, as also the settlement arrived at between the parties, I find that no useful purpose shall be served in continuing with the proceedings of the present FIR as it would create further acrimony between the parties and will be an unnecessary burden on the state exchequer," he noted.

The complainant, present in the court through video conferencing, confirmed the settlement and affirmed that it was made voluntarily without coercion.

As part of the court's order, the accused is required to assist the Traffic Police at a traffic signal for a period of 30 days.

"…the petitioner shall assist the Traffic Police at a traffic signal where he may be deputed by the DCP, Traffic, East District, for a period of 30 days. He shall report to the DCP Traffic for rendering assistance at a traffic signal assigned to him," the court said.

It said that the man must report to the designated Traffic Police authority and fulfil his duties accordingly.

Justice Chawla ordered: "At the end of the aforesaid period of 30 days, the DCP Traffic shall issue a certificate to the petitioner, which the petitioner shall thereafter file before this Court within a period of two months from today. If such a certificate is not filed, the Registry shall place this matter before this Court for further directions."

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalGujarat: VGRC highlights growing urgency of sustainable material use

CricketNandni Sharma stars with hat-trick in final over as Delhi Capitals restrict Gujarat Giants to 209

AurangabadUphold constitutional values of ‘Justice, Equality & Fraternity’: Justice Varale

AurangabadUnlocking education opportunities for every student

Other SportsWTT Feeder Series 2026: Manush Shah, Ryu Hanna win men’s and women’s singles titles

National Realted Stories

NationalIndia Will One Day Have a Hijab-Clad Woman as PM, Says Owaisi;BJP Calls Remark Irresponsible

NationalVibrant Gujarat: Partner nations laud PM Modi, share perspectives on development

NationalAAP legislators not backing Atishi over remark row: Delhi BJP

NationalEx-Navy Chief Admiral Arun Prakash shares Goa SIR ordeal on social media

NationalRajasthan: Congress members in Sawai Madhopur observe day-long fast against G RAM G Act