City
Epaper

Delhi HC seeks Centre's response on plea over non-payment of stipend to foreign medical graduates

By ANI | Updated: August 16, 2021 14:45 IST

The Delhi High Court on Monday sought a response from the Centre on Association for MD Physicians petition preferring to expeditiously decide its representation on seeking to address the issue of non-payment of stipend to foreign medical graduates undertaking a 12-month compulsory rotation internship in India.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court on Monday sought a response from the Centre on Association for MD Physicians petition preferring to expeditiously decide its representation on seeking to address the issue of non-payment of stipend to foreign medical graduates undertaking a 12-month compulsory rotation internship in India.

Justice Rekha Palli asked the Centre to file a reply and listed the matter for September 23.

The Association of MD Physicians in its petition has sought to issue direction to extend the benefit of the payment of a stipend to the foreign medical graduates holding their primary medical qualification from recognized medical colleges outside India for undertaking a compulsory rotational internship in India, much like their Indian counterparts who are pursuing their undergraduate medical studies from institutions in India and are paid a stipend.

Additionally, a direction to the Centre to appropriately address the issue of non-payment of stipend to foreign medical graduates undertaking a 12-month compulsory rotation internship in India, thereby bringing them at par with Indian medical graduates and students pursuing MBBS in India was also sought by the petitioner.

The Delhi High Court on January 22, 2021, directed the respondents to consider the representation dated December 3, 2020, made by the petitioner to the respondents within a period of eight weeks.

"Despite the direction passed by Court's direction in Order dated January 22, 2021, the respondents have failed to consider the representation dated December 3, 2020, (and respond to the same), and therefore have failed to comply with the direction of this Court vide order dated January 22, 2021. As a result thereof, the petitioner/ applicant has preferred the instant Application seeking compliance of the order dated January 22, 2021, in the alternative to reagitate the reliefs sought in the subject petition, and thereby reanimate the subject Petition," the petitioner said.

The petition was filed by advocates Adit S Pujari and Kajal Dalal.

The petitioner has urged the court to direct the respondents Centre to consider and respond to the representation dated December 3, 2020, within a period of two weeks expeditiously.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Jerilynn PriorRekha palliKajal dalalDelhi High CourtDelhi delhi high courtRekha pall
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalTMC MP Mahua Moitra Approaches Delhi High Court Against Ex-Boyfriend Over Custody of Pet Dog Henry

Entertainment‘Celebrities Aren’t Public Property’: Vivek Oberoi’s Lawyer Sana Raees Khan Hails HC Order Protecting His Personality Rights

NationalDelhi Demolition Drive: 5 Cops Injured After Clashes Erupt Over Bulldozer Action Near Faiz-e-Elahi Masjid

EntertainmentSuperstar NTR Secures Landmark Legal Protection for Personality Rights; Actor Thanks Delhi HC Court In Appreciation Post

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Shares in Focus on Monday After Delhi HC Grants Major Relief in Union Bank Fraud Case

National Realted Stories

NationalChhattisgarh CM outlines Bastar 2.0 development plan after meeting PM Modi

NationalRailways to drive growth as India targets 3,000 million tonnes freight capacity by 2030

NationalBJP on upward trajectory in Kerala, will become largest party: Anil K. Antony

NationalNDA is zero-seat party in Kerala, says Shashi Tharoor as state sees strong voter turnout

NationalMedia urged to refrain from revealing trainee pilot’s identity in Hyderabad sexual assault case