City
Epaper

Delhi HC seeks Centre's response on plea over non-payment of stipend to foreign medical graduates

By ANI | Updated: August 16, 2021 14:45 IST

The Delhi High Court on Monday sought a response from the Centre on Association for MD Physicians petition preferring to expeditiously decide its representation on seeking to address the issue of non-payment of stipend to foreign medical graduates undertaking a 12-month compulsory rotation internship in India.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court on Monday sought a response from the Centre on Association for MD Physicians petition preferring to expeditiously decide its representation on seeking to address the issue of non-payment of stipend to foreign medical graduates undertaking a 12-month compulsory rotation internship in India.

Justice Rekha Palli asked the Centre to file a reply and listed the matter for September 23.

The Association of MD Physicians in its petition has sought to issue direction to extend the benefit of the payment of a stipend to the foreign medical graduates holding their primary medical qualification from recognized medical colleges outside India for undertaking a compulsory rotational internship in India, much like their Indian counterparts who are pursuing their undergraduate medical studies from institutions in India and are paid a stipend.

Additionally, a direction to the Centre to appropriately address the issue of non-payment of stipend to foreign medical graduates undertaking a 12-month compulsory rotation internship in India, thereby bringing them at par with Indian medical graduates and students pursuing MBBS in India was also sought by the petitioner.

The Delhi High Court on January 22, 2021, directed the respondents to consider the representation dated December 3, 2020, made by the petitioner to the respondents within a period of eight weeks.

"Despite the direction passed by Court's direction in Order dated January 22, 2021, the respondents have failed to consider the representation dated December 3, 2020, (and respond to the same), and therefore have failed to comply with the direction of this Court vide order dated January 22, 2021. As a result thereof, the petitioner/ applicant has preferred the instant Application seeking compliance of the order dated January 22, 2021, in the alternative to reagitate the reliefs sought in the subject petition, and thereby reanimate the subject Petition," the petitioner said.

The petition was filed by advocates Adit S Pujari and Kajal Dalal.

The petitioner has urged the court to direct the respondents Centre to consider and respond to the representation dated December 3, 2020, within a period of two weeks expeditiously.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Jerilynn PriorRekha palliKajal dalalDelhi High CourtDelhi delhi high courtRekha pall
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi High Court: Disruption of Parliament viewed as a serious threat

NationalDelhi HC Stays Release of Vijay Raaz’s Udaipur Files Until Centre Decides on Certification Review

National2023 Parliament Security Breach Case: Accused Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat Granted Bail by Delhi High Court

NationalRCB Approaches Delhi High Court Against Uber Over Advertisement Featuring Travis Head

NationalSupreme Court Judges Unanimously Agreed To Declare Their Assets

National Realted Stories

NationalHurting nation while cornering govt is not acceptable: BJP leader slams LoP Gandhi after SC rebuke

NationalT'gana Cong leaders set to begin 3-day protest in Delhi on Backward Class quota

NationalMet office forecasts more rains in north Bengal even as hill areas hit by landslides

NationalRajasthan: 3 workers killed, 5 injured as wall collapses in construction site

NationalPWD hiring case: Big relief for Satyendar Jain as Delhi court accepts CBI closure report