City
Epaper

Delhi HC to hear ED's final submissions on Satyendar Jain's bail plea on Feb 27

By IANS | Updated: February 25, 2023 10:25 IST

New Delhi, Feb 25 The Delhi High Court will hear final submissions of Enforcement Directorate on the bail ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 25 The Delhi High Court will hear final submissions of Enforcement Directorate on the bail plea of jailed AAP Minister Satyendar Jain on February 27 in connection with a money laundering case.

Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma could not hear the submissions of the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S. V. Raju for ED due to an another urgent matter, however, the judge ordered to take up final submissions of the ASG next week.

The ASG had earlier contented that money laundering is crystal clear.

"Their case is that Satyendar Jain has nothing to do with it. I have to establish that Satyendar Jain was in the thick of these things," he had said.

Earlier, on February 13, the High Court had adjourned hearing in bail plea od Satyendar Jain and co-accused Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain.

On February 8, advocate Sushil Kumar Gupta, appearing for Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain, the two aides of the Minister had concluded his submissions before the bench of Justice Sharma.

He had contended that in the present case, the ED is just investigating the predicate offence and not the money laundering case, and that the ED had presumptively established a case of disproportionate assets (DA), but this could not be their case because the agency must first establish the existence of a scheduled offence.

Citing the Vijay Madan Lal Judgment of the apex court, Gupta had argued that the role that the ED has given to his clients (Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain) in the current case should be different from the CBI case, but the ED has accused them under the same rules.

He had further argued that the "proceeds of crime is the core" that needed to be established in the present case by the ED to have a case against his clients.

Earlier, Gupta, on behalf of his clients, had said: "We have been roped in because the company, as per the Enforcement Directorate, belonged to Satyendar Jain."

He had added: "We are stating that it is our company, not Satyendar Jain's."

The Jains' counsel had said that Satyendar Jain has nothing to do with the company and that all the companies belong to them.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Dinesh kumar sharmaDelhi High CourtSatyendar JainEnforcement DirectorateDelhi delhi high courtDepartment of economic affairs of finance ministryRevenue and department of economic affairsGovernment of india, directorate of enforcementFormer enforcement directorateU.k. high court
Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentSunjay Kapur Property Dispute: Delhi HC Backs Karisma Kapoor’s Children, Rejects Priya Kapur’s Secrecy Bid

EntertainmentAR Rahman Secures Relief as Delhi High Court Overturns Single-Judge Order in Veera Raja Veera Copyright Case

NationalSupreme Court Adjourns Hearing on Bail Pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and Others in Delhi Riots Case

PuneNews of ED Raid on Pune Construction Majors False

MumbaiBomb Threat At Bombay Hight Court Entire Premises Evacuated

National Realted Stories

NationalNCRB report 2023: Odisha among states with highest crime rate against women

NationalPresident Murmu presents special honour to her bodyguard

NationalCricketer Tilak Varma calls on Telangana CM Revanth Reddy

NationalManipur: Four militants arrested; arms, IEDs, drugs seized

NationalAshok Gehlot condemns RSS event at Rajasthan University, questions police role