City
Epaper

Delhi violence: HC allows two petitioners to withdraw pleas

By ANI | Updated: July 27, 2020 14:46 IST

The Delhi High Court, while hearing several petitions related to the northeast Delhi violence in February this year, on Monday allowed two petitioners to withdraw their pleas with the liberty to approach trial courts.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court, while hearing several petitions related to the northeast Delhi violence in February this year, on Monday allowed two petitioners to withdraw their pleas with the liberty to approach trial courts.

A bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan allowed petitioners Harsh Mandar and Brinda Karat, who were represented by senior lawyer Kapil Sibal and advocate Adit Pujari respectively, to withdraw their petitions.

The petitioners, who withdrew their petition, had sought registration of FIRs under provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) in the northeast Delhi violence matter.

The High Court also adjourned the matter for next Monday noting that some of the rejoinders and counter-affidavits were not on-record.

The court, while hearing the submission in the matter, showed displeasure with one of the petitioners -- Ajay Gautam -- and said, "don't make political speeches here in court". Gautam while making his submissions had said that one community intentionally making attempts to destabilise the peace of the country.

Earlier, the High Court had granted the last opportunity to file rejoinders and affidavits by the concerned parties on several petitions filed over the northeast Delhi violence in February this year.

The Delhi Police, in its affidavit on the pleas, had submitted that the police authorities acted promptly, vigilantly, and effectively without any fear or favour as a result of which violence could be contained in few days and to a limited area.

"Speeches of political leaders including Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi, Anurag Thakur, Kapil Mishra, Pravesh Verma, Waris Pathan, and others are being examined by the Delhi Police and necessary action in this regard will be taken in due course of time if it is found on the evidence that their speech had any nexus with the riots," the affidavit said.

In the affidavit, the Delhi Police said that the petitions raising questions on the investigation is nothing but a blatant and brazen misuse of the public interest litigation.

Around 53 people lost their lives in the violence that erupted in northeast Delhi after clashes erupted between two opposing factions over the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: Prateek jalanDelhi High CourtBrinda KaratHigh CourtDelhi delhi high courtHong kong high court
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai: FIR Filed Against NCB Zonal Director Amit Ghawate Following High Court Order

NationalTMC MP Mahua Moitra Approaches Delhi High Court Against Ex-Boyfriend Over Custody of Pet Dog Henry

Entertainment‘Celebrities Aren’t Public Property’: Vivek Oberoi’s Lawyer Sana Raees Khan Hails HC Order Protecting His Personality Rights

NationalDelhi Demolition Drive: 5 Cops Injured After Clashes Erupt Over Bulldozer Action Near Faiz-e-Elahi Masjid

EntertainmentSuperstar NTR Secures Landmark Legal Protection for Personality Rights; Actor Thanks Delhi HC Court In Appreciation Post

National Realted Stories

NationalECI reshuffles Officers-in-Charge of several police stations in Kolkata

NationalBeats of tradition: Folk arts energise Tamil Nadu Assembly election campaign trails

NationalBengal poll: Crowd surge at Cooch Behar rally as PM Modi set to kickstart BJP's poll push

NationalKanpur Shocker: Man Tries to Kill Daughter in Name of Black Magic, Held by Police near Ramganga Canal

NationalDelhi Crime Branch busts major racket diverting Govt medicines meant for free distribution