City
Epaper

'Didn't ask to be called lordships': SC junks plea attacking court

By IANS | Updated: February 18, 2021 19:15 IST

New Delhi, Feb 18 The Supreme Court on Thursday asked a petitioner not to indulge in "making wild ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 18 The Supreme Court on Thursday asked a petitioner not to indulge in "making wild allegations" against the top court and its registry for delay in the listing of his special leave petition.

The petitioner submitted before a bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde that he had moved a plea in the top court in the first week of November last year, challenging a Delhi High Court order, which denied him visitation rights for his child. He said at that point in time, his grandmother was on death bed and her last wish was to meet her grandchild.

The petitioner claimed the top court registry did not list his matter urgently despite several requests. In the last week of November, his grandmother passed away and his petition was still not listed, he added. After non-listing of his plea, the petitioner filed a fresh writ petition against the top registry.

The bench, also comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, said that the court sympathises with him, and also condoles his grandmother's death but it "cannot grant listing based on some relative's health".

The bench also told the petitioner that it can grant circulation of his matter, but he should not make allegations.

Irked by sweeping comments made against the court and its registry in the petition, the bench said: "You seem to have a problem with whole world. Why do you write all this in the petition... that lawyers call judges lordship... We never asked to be called lordships. There is a law of pleadings and only relevant facts can be pleaded."

The Chief Justice told the petitioner that procedure of the court is not responsible for denial of his visitation rights or for death of his grandmother.

The petitioner submitted before the bench that his only argument is that he was entitled to get a hearing from the court, as per his grandmother's last wish.

Dismissing the petition, the bench said: "We don't know who is advising you."

The petitioner had made the top court respondent, through its Secretary General, in the matter.

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Delhi High CourtThe Supreme CourtDelhi delhi high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalTMC MP Mahua Moitra Approaches Delhi High Court Against Ex-Boyfriend Over Custody of Pet Dog Henry

Entertainment‘Celebrities Aren’t Public Property’: Vivek Oberoi’s Lawyer Sana Raees Khan Hails HC Order Protecting His Personality Rights

NationalDelhi Demolition Drive: 5 Cops Injured After Clashes Erupt Over Bulldozer Action Near Faiz-e-Elahi Masjid

EntertainmentSuperstar NTR Secures Landmark Legal Protection for Personality Rights; Actor Thanks Delhi HC Court In Appreciation Post

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Shares in Focus on Monday After Delhi HC Grants Major Relief in Union Bank Fraud Case

National Realted Stories

NationalRs 62 crore boost for animal healthcare in Delhi: CM Rekha Gupta

NationalGujarat: Pakistani gangster Shehzad Bhatti's associate held in Punjab grenade case

NationalNo address proof needed for 5-kg LPG cylinders; Centre eases access for migrants, students

National'Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam' campaign receives public support; NDMC VC Kuljeet Chahal leads tree plantation in Laxmibai Nagar

NationalBJP faces tough battle in Kerala, West Bengal: Majeed Memon