City
Epaper

Harassment case: SC grants 4 weeks to Assam govt to file affidavit on IYC president Srinivas BV's plea

By ANI | Updated: July 10, 2023 18:25 IST

New Delhi [India], July 10 : The Supreme Court on Monday granted four weeks to the State of Assam ...

Open in App

New Delhi [India], July 10 : The Supreme Court on Monday granted four weeks to the State of Assam to file its affidavit on a plea of Indian Youth Congress president Srinivas BV, challenging Gauhati High Court order rejecting his anticipatory bail plea in alleged harassment case filed against him.

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and JB Pardiwala adjourned the hearing for six weeks after the counsel of the Assam government sought time to file an affidavit.

Earlier, the apex court had granted anticipatory bail to Srinivas in an FIR registered against him by expelled woman party member for allegedly causing her mental agony.

Srinivas challenged the Gauhati High Court order rejecting his anticipatory bail plea.

On May 5, the Gauhati High Court rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Srinivas in a case lodged by a former colleague and the ex-president of Assam Youth Congress accusing him of causing mental agony to her.

High Court had also refused to quash the FIR.

In her complaint, the woman alleged that Srinivas persistently harassed her mentally by way of sexist remarks and slang words.

On her complaint, an FIR was registered to book Srinivas under Sections 352 (assault or criminal force), 354 (assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty) and 354A (1)(iv) (sexual harassment) of the Indian Penal Code.

The woman had claimed that Srinivas had heckled her, held her arm, pushed and pulled her and used slang words during the party's recent plenary session in Raipur. He had also threatened to ruin her career in the party if she complained against him, she alleged.

The alleged offence had occurred in Raipur in Chhattisgarh which was beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the Dispur police station, where the case was filed and Assam police had no jurisdiction to investigate or register an FIR for an offence which allegedly took place in Chhattisgarh, Srinivas said.

The Congress had issued a show cause notice to the woman and later expelled her from the primary membership of the party for six years for anti-party activities.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Srinivas B. V.Jb pardiwalaNew DelhiNew Delhi Lok SabhaUs Supreme CourtRaipurJudge Of The Supreme CourtSupreme CourtThe Supreme CourtBench Of The Supreme CourtUnited States Supreme CourtNew Delhi District
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalIndiGo Flight from Indore to Raipur Makes Emergency Landing After Experiencing Sudden Jolt Mid-Air

NationalRaipur Suitcase Murder Case Update: Lawyer and Wife Arrested for Allegedly Killing Disabled Man, Hiding Body in Steel Suitcase

National Realted Stories

NationalNIA charge sheets five Maoist in 2024 Chhattisgarh arms recovery case

NationalRahul Gandhi’s remarks completely baseless, he is yet to respond to June 12 letter: EC

NationalYouth Parliament in Rajasthan Assembly echoes strong views on terrorism, PoK and national security

NationalTejashwi under cloud over ‘forged duplicate’ voter ID card: Election office source

NationalHours after realtor Gill joined BJP, Punjab Vigilance raids his residence, office