City
Epaper

HC 'guardian for its subordinates': SC directs relief to Jharkhand woman judicial officer

By IANS | Updated: August 22, 2025 19:20 IST

New Delhi, Aug 22 The Supreme Court on Friday came to the aid of a woman judicial officer ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 22 The Supreme Court on Friday came to the aid of a woman judicial officer in Jharkhand, directing the High Court to reconsider her transfer in light of her personal circumstances.

A bench of Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, while hearing the plea of Additional District Judge (ADJ) Kashika M. Prasad, observed that High Courts must act as guardians of their subordinate judiciary.

"The High Court should be sensitive towards the problems of its judicial officers and take care of their personal and family circumstances. The High Court is the guardian for its subordinate judicial officers. Such matters should not be made an issue of prestige," the bench remarked.

Prasad, currently posted at Hazaribagh District Court, is a single parent to her son and belongs to the Scheduled Caste category. She had sought six months of child care leave to look after her son, who is preparing for his Class 10 board examinations. However, the Jharkhand High Court sanctioned only three months of leave, following which she was transferred to Dumka.

In her representation to the High Court, she had requested that she be allowed to continue in Hazaribagh or be shifted to Ranchi or Bokaro, so that her son’s studies were not disrupted. With her plea unaddressed, she moved the Supreme Court.

After hearing the matter, the apex court ordered that the petitioner be either retained in Hazaribagh or transferred to Bokaro till March-April 2026, by which time her son will have completed his board examinations.

The bench directed the Jharkhand High Court to comply with its order within two weeks.

This is not the first time the matter reached the Supreme Court. Earlier, when the ADJ’s request for child care leave was only partially approved, the top court had sought responses from both the Jharkhand government and the High Court registry.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Politics"Hope it would pave way for lasting peace in region": Mehbooba Mufti welcomes US-Iran ceasefire

LifestyleToday's Horoscope, April 10, 2026: Check Your Zodiac Sign's Predictions and Birthday Forecast

PoliticsAIMIM cuts ties with Humayun Kabir's party, to contest Bengal polls independently

NationalUttarakhand government geared up for Char Dham Yatra, no cap on pilgrims: Chief Minister Dhami

InternationalNASA’s Artemis II nears earth return after historic record-breaking lunar mission

National Realted Stories

NationalCourt imposes a fine of Rs 1.72 lakh on domestic consumer for electricity theft

NationalTipra Motha's defeat is certain; ADC people will create history on April 12: Tripura CM

National"Making new efforts to integrate women into mainstream": UP Women's panel chief hails PM Modi

National"Additional force will be deployed in all 28 constituencies": Tripura DGP on ADC polls

NationalFire breaks out in Lucknow's vegetable market