City
Epaper

India does not have a statutory sentencing policy till date: Supreme Court

By IANS | Updated: September 5, 2023 20:30 IST

New Delhi, Sep 5 The Supreme Court has observed that India does not have a statutory sentencing policy ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 5 The Supreme Court has observed that India does not have a statutory sentencing policy till date and while imposing sentence, the courts take aggravating and mitigating circumstances of a case into consideration.

In a recent judgement, a bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Sanjay Karol while hearing a criminal appeal, reduced the sentence imposed on the appellant from 5 years to 3 years in the interest of justice.

The special leave petition was filed against an order of the Allahabad High Court in 2019, confirming the decision of the trial court rendered in 1987 sentencing Pramod Kumar Mishra for 5 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder).

In appeal, the Supreme Court was considering whether the sentence imposed by the trial court and as upheld by the high court is just and proper.

Attempt to commit murder is a punishable offence, the punishment for which is up to 10 years of imprisonment and if the act committed has caused hurt to the person, then punishment may extend to life imprisonment and fine or both.

The apex court noted that India does not have a sentencing policy till date and in the absence of such guidelines in India, the courts go by their own perception about the philosophy behind the prescription of specified penal consequences for a particular crime.

Referring to a precedent, it said that courts have a primary duty to delicately balance the aggravating and mitigating factors and circumstances in which a crime has been committed. It noted that 39 years have passed since the date of offence and the other accused persons were also acquitted in the case.

"There are no criminal antecedents of the appellant that have been brought on record. Further, from the record, it cannot be said that the appellant acted in a premeditated manner, whatsoever," the Supreme Court said.

"The appeal is partly allowed …The appellant is directed to undergo the remaining period of his sentence," it ordered while reducing the sentence to 3 years of rigorous imprisonment, adding a fine of Rs 50,000.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

CricketIPL 2026: Why MS Dhoni Is Not Playing Today’s Chennai Super Kings vs Kolkata Knight Riders Match? EXPLAINED

CricketIPL 2026, CSK vs KKR Today Match LIVE Cricket Streaming: When and Where To Watch Chennai Super Kings vs Kolkata Knight Riders Match

Other Sports'We have to wait until tomorrow': Arsenal boss Arteta leaves Rice’s Champions League status uncertain

NationalCongress pins hope on Malda, but multi-cornered contest likely to split anti-BJP votes

NationalPunjab Police neutralise Pak-ISI terror module; 6 arrested for Amritsar grenade attack

National Realted Stories

NationalTN polls: Vijay unveils major welfare promises for weavers, farmers and police during Tiruppur campaign

NationalRahul Gandhi slams Centre over India-US trade deal​

National‘Game-change’: L-G Sandhu praises Delhi-Dehradun Economic Corridor​

NationalCongress sidelined Ambedkar politically: Rajasthan CM ​

NationalMP: Anganwadi and ASHA workers rejoice over receiving Ayushman Bharat cards in Neemuch​