City
Epaper

JD-S MLA H.D. Revanna granted conditional bail in sexual harassment case

By IANS | Updated: May 20, 2024 19:10 IST

Bengaluru, May 20 The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's (ACMM) court on Monday granted conditional bail to JD-S MLA ...

Open in App

Bengaluru, May 20 The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's (ACMM) court on Monday granted conditional bail to JD-S MLA H.D. Revanna in a sexual harassment case.

Revanna, the son of former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda, was recently released from prison in a kidnap case.

Magistrate J. Preeth directed Revanna to furnish a bond for Rs 5 lakh along with a surety.

Claiming that a rape charge has been included in the sexual harassment case against Revanna, the prosecution argued in the court that he should be remanded to judicial custody.

On Friday, special public prosecutor Jayna Kothari, appearing for the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the case, had submitted that IPC Section 376 (rape) has been added to the sexual harassment case registered at the Holenarasipur police station.

“The victim claimed that she had left her house, as she was unable to bear the harassment at the hands of H.D. Revanna and his son Prajwal Revanna. The house allotted to her under the Ashraya scheme was taken back, but a complaint to the District Commissioner in this regard made no difference,” Kothari argued.

"Both H.D. Revanna and Prajwal Revanna committed sexual assault, and the court should not see the case against Revanna as separate from that of Prajwal Revanna. Under no circumstances should he be granted bail. Since a rape charge has been added to the case, the trial should be conducted in the session’s court," she had claimed.

C.V. Nagesh, the counsel for H.D. Revanna, had claimed that the complaint in this regard was not lodged by the complainant in the first place.

"It is a false case created intentionally. The victim does not know what sexual assault is," he argued.

"The rape charge against Revanna has been added only now. The alleged act was not committed on the day when the complaint was lodged. It did not occur a week ago or even a year ago. The complaint states that the alleged act was committed years ago.

"The victim did not register the complaint at the Holenarasipur police station. Instead, the sub-inspector from Holenarasipur police station went to Bengaluru and got the complaint filed as desired by the victim," Nagesh said.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalPakistan's crackdown on Ahmadis exposes deep-rooted institutional persecution: Report

International"A whole civilisation will die tonight": Trump claims "total regime change" in Iran as deadline looms

NationalSkill as source of livelihood: PM Vishwakarma Yojana changes fortunes of Damoh youths

InternationalUS has largely achieved military objectives in Iran: JD Vance

NationalEast Champaran hooch tragedy: Major disaster averted due to timely seizures of 1,500 litres of methanol, says Bihar DGP

National Realted Stories

NationalTronglaobi bomb attack case to be handed over to NIA: Manipur CM Yumnam Khemchand Singh

NationalPadma Shri Chutni Mahato extends support to women reservation bill, questions Congress’s silence

NationalRapper Badshah apologies in NCW over ‘Tateeree’ song, vows to empower women

NationalMP: Pravin Togadia joins Bhojshala satyagraha, demands restoration of Goddess Vagdevi idol

NationalAkali Dal to help farmers for crop damage in Punjab rains