City
Epaper

Kerala Gold smuggling: Sivasankar's activities within definition of concealment under PMLA, says ED

By ANI | Updated: December 18, 2020 22:40 IST

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Friday stated in the Kerala High Court that former principal secretary of the Kerala Chief Minister's Office (CMO) M Sivasankar's activities comes squarely within the definition of concealment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Open in App

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Friday stated in the Kerala High Court that former principal secretary of the Kerala Chief Minister's Office (CMO) M Sivasankar's activities comes squarely within the definition of concealment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

In the hearing of the bail petition, filed by Sivasankar, the ED further said that Kerala Gold Smuggling Case accused Swapna Suresh didn't mention Sivasankar's name initially because he was influential.

The Court reserved the matter for orders.

The ED further stated, "Lower court order denying bail to Sivasankar was well-reasoned. The joint locker operated by Kerala Gold Smuggling Case accused Swapna Suresh and Sivasankar as well as a separate locker she held with Sivasankar's Chartered Accountant. Swapna was not a person of means, she could not have Rs 64 Lakh and gold sovereigns with her."

It further said that Sivasankar had asked for updates on the locker, which showed he had an interest in the money.

"She has admitted that Sivasankar was aware of the gold smuggling. This is the testimony of a co-conspirator. Accused can be given access to the material only after a probe is complete."

The ED further said that Sivasankar telephoned Customs officials on her behalf to clear smuggled gold through customs checks.

"They said we have no material, these days no one makes a telephone call. We make WhatsApp calls, which are encrypted. Difficult to get records of these, but cannot say we have no material.

The investigation is still going on. ED empowered to investigate and investigation ongoing," it added.

The ED concluded by saying that this was not a simple case, as Sivasankar had influence, and power, the wherewithal to tamper with evidence, and influence witnesses.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

CricketIPL 2026: Is Matheesha Pathirana Playing in Today’s KKR vs RR Match?

NationalDual citizenship row: Allahabad HC likely to hear Rahul Gandhi's stand tomorrow

NationalSecond batch of Haj pilgrims depart from Vijayawada

PoliticsMK Stalin misleading entire country on Delimitation, South will "lose big": HD Kumaraswamy

Other SportsPunjab, Odisha continue their strong hockey tradition with regular podium placements in domestic tournaments

National Realted Stories

NationalStalin unveils 'Chennai Super 6' manifesto with 20 key promises ahead of polls

NationalI am recovering steadily, says Pawan Kalyan

NationalDRI continues crackdown on narcotics trafficking: Rs 1.58 cr worth crystal methamphetamine seized at Calicut International airport

NationalBengal's cultural identity might change by Trinamool's agenda to encourage illegal infiltration: PM Modi

NationalAfter unrest in Ahmedabad, 4-member SIT set up to probe youth’s murder