City
Epaper

Misleading ads case: Patanjali tells SC that it has withdrawn sales and advertisements of banned products

By IANS | Updated: July 9, 2024 18:55 IST

New Delhi, July 9 Patanjali Ayurved on Tuesday apprised the Supreme Court that it has withdrawn the sale ...

Open in App

New Delhi, July 9 Patanjali Ayurved on Tuesday apprised the Supreme Court that it has withdrawn the sale and advertisements of products whose manufacturing licenses were suspended by the Uttarakhand State Licencing Authority in April this year.

A bench, headed by Justice Hima Kohli, was hearing a plea filed by the Indian Medical Association seeking action against Patanjali for violation of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 – which prohibits the advertisement of certain products for the treatment of specified diseases and disorders, including diabetes, heart diseases, high or low blood pressure and obesity.

Earlier, the top court had questioned senior advocate Balbir Singh, representing Patanjali, about the continued presence of misleading ads, particularly on social media platforms.

In an affidavit filed before the apex court in April this year, the Uttarakhand government said that it has granted permission to file a complaint against Ramdev's Divya Pharmacy and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. for repeated violations of the drug advertisements law and suspended manufacturing licenses for 14 of their products.

The Supreme Court court had rejected the "unconditional and unqualified apology" tendered by Ramdev and Balkrishna and took strong exception over the violation of the undertaking given to the apex court in November last year.

Patanjali had earlier assured the top court that it would not make any casual statements claiming the medicinal efficacy of its products or advertise or brand them in violation of law and would not release any statement against any system of medicine to the media in any form.

The Supreme Court also took note of the apology issued by Indian Medical Association (IMA) President Dr R.V. Asokan in the IMA's monthly magazine and official website for his statement terming the oral observations made by the apex court during Patanjali misleading advertisements case against allopathy practitioners as "unfortunate" and a "very vague and general statement which has demoralised the doctors".

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalHondurans to decide whether to go from Left to Right as polling begins

International"Biden, Harris screwed our country," says Trump as US admin enhances vetting measures for immigrants

InternationalHomeland Security holds Biden administration responsible for killing of Sarah Beckstrom

CricketBCCI president Manhas hails Team India for win over South Africa at Ranchi

Cricket"There's no questions about anything": Batting coach Kotak on Virat's long-term future after ton at Ranchi

National Realted Stories

NationalPM Modi, Rahul, Kharge to be invited to Telangana Rising Global Summit

NationalAssam to inaugurate martyrs' memorial in December

NationalDigital push, NEP bringing out a more creative, research-driven youth: Arunachal Guv

National13 Bangladeshi fishermen taken into custody at Andhra Pradesh coast

NationalArunachal Guv discusses eastern border security with senior Army officers