City
Epaper

'Not possible to have HC at doorstep', SC on Odisha lawyers' agitation

By IANS | Updated: November 28, 2022 22:20 IST

New Delhi, Nov 28 The Supreme Court said on Monday that it is not possible to have a ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Nov 28 The Supreme Court said on Monday that it is not possible to have a high court at doorstep, while expressing discontent over protesting bar association members in Odisha seeking permanent bench of the Orissa High Court in western Odisha.

The top court said that it expects the Bar Council of India (BCI) to take appropriate action, including suspension of licences.

A bench comprising Justices S.K. Kaul and A.S. Oka said, every district wants high court benches? Noting that Odisha is a big state, the bench added that district judiciary can be at doorstep but it is not possible to have a high court at "your doorstep". "It cannot be done," said the bench.

One of the demands of protesting lawyers is the establishment of a permanent bench of the Orissa High Court in western Odisha.

In a supplementary affidavit, the High Court's registrar general said that the agitation and picketing continued in some areas of the state. The top court said that the court work cannot stop and termed the conduct of lawyers as intolerable, which has disrupted the functioning of the district courts.

The bench said, "If leaders of the bar associations in Odisha seek to invite action, we will have to oblige them."

The bench further added that it expects the BCI to take appropriate action against members of the different bar associations and added that their licences to be suspended at least till the work is resumed.

The top court has scheduled the matter for further hearing on December 12.

On November 14, the Supreme Court had said it could initiate contempt proceedings or suspend licences of the striking members of the bar associations in several districts of Odisha, as it asked them to resume work by November 16.

The top court was hearing the High Court's registrar general application which contended that abstention of work by members of the bar associations in several districts has seriously hampered the judicial work in the subordinate courts of the state.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtOrissa high courtHigh court of orissaOdisha high courtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraUPSC Cheating Case: Pooja Khedkar Denies Allegations of Exam Fraud, Name Change and Fake Disability Certificate

NationalSupreme Court Dismisses PIL on Pahalgam Terror Attack Investigation

NationalJustice BR Gavai Appointed as 52nd Chief Justice of India, Oath on May 14

NationalSexually Explicit Content on OTT, Social Media: Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

National Realted Stories

NationalGoa stampede sparks shake-up: Several officers moved, inquiry committee formed

NationalAdding cargo compartments to metro trains will boost business efficiency: Manohar Lal

NationalOdisha's decision for probe into controversy surrounding Jagannath temple in Digha justified: Bengal BJP leader

NationalNavy Chief meets PM Modi as India tightens noose around Pakistan

NationalGujarat Road Accident: 6 Dead, 8 Injured in Collision Between Jeep, State Transport Bus and Motorcycle in Sabarkantha (Watch Video)