City
Epaper

'Open court hearing on Oct 12', SC on SEBI's review petition against RIL

By IANS | Updated: October 1, 2022 15:35 IST

New Delhi, Oct 1 The Supreme Court will hear SEBIs petition, in an open court, seeking review of ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Oct 1 The Supreme Court will hear SEBIs petition, in an open court, seeking review of its August 5 judgment, which directed the market regulator to share certain documents with Reliance Industries Limited (RIL).

A bench headed by Chief Justice U.U. Lalit and comprising Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Hima Kohli said: "Considering the facts and circumstances on record and the submissions advanced in the review petition, we deem it appropriate to allow application for listing of the instant petition in open court. Let this review petition be listed in court on October 12, 2022."

SEBI has refused to entertain RIL's request to share the privileged documents on the grounds that under the Sebi (Settlement Proceedings) Regulations, the accused company has no right to seek information from it.

The apex court, in its judgement, had rejected this stand of the market regulator.

RIL had claimed that documents will exonerate it and its promoters from criminal prosecution initiated in a case related to the alleged irregularities in acquisition of its own shares between 1994 and 2000.

Last week, a bench headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna had recused from hearing RIL's petition seeking to initiate contempt proceedings against SEBI for failing to provide certain documents to the company.

On August 5, a bench led by then Chief Justice N.V. Ramana had said: "The approach of SEBI, in failing to disclose the documents, also raises concerns of transparency and fair trial. Opaqueness only propagates prejudice and partiality. Opaqueness is antithetical to transparency."

The top court had said the market regulator should show fairness and furnish documents sought by RIL, and SEBI has a duty to act fairly, while conducting proceedings or initiating any action against the parties.

RIL filed a contempt petition as SEBI has not shared three documents the two legal opinions by former apex court judge B.N. Srikrishna and former ICAI president Y.H. Malegam's report which examined the irregularities.

The company claimed SEBI cannot continue to resist the production of these documents and it had also sent a notice to the regulator saying if documents were not received by August 18, then it will establish that SEBI does not want to comply with the apex court's judgment.

In 2002, Chartered Accountant S. Gurumurthy filed a complaint with SEBI alleging irregularities by RIL, its associate companies and their directors/promoters, including Mukesh Ambani and his wife, Nita; Anil Ambani and his wife, Tina; and 98 others.

The complaint cited the issue of two preferential placement of non-convertible debentures in 1994.

SEBI had alleged that RIL along with Reliance Petroleum had circuitously funded the acquisition of its own shares in violation of the Sections 77 and 77A of the Companies Act, 1956.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: OctopusMukesh AmbaniSupreme CourtMukesh ambHima kohliMukesh d ambBillionaire mukesh ambanis reliance industriesSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

BusinessStock Market Investors Lose ₹5 Lakh Crore After Trump’s 25% Tariff on India; Mukesh Ambani’s Jio Financial Shares Rise

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

BusinessJio Financial Services Q1 FY26 Results: Revenue Soars 47%, Net Profit Rises to ₹325 Crore Under Mukesh Ambani's Leadership

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

National Realted Stories

NationalNagamohan Das Commission submits 1,766-page report on internal reservation to Karnataka CM

NationalComplaints filed against Adoor Gopalakrishnan over remarks on SC/ST filmmakers

NationalTejashwi himself made mistake in process: BJP, JD(U) slam RJD leader over 'name missing' from voter roll claim

NationalHaryana rights panel comes to rescue of senior citizen for denying basic entitlements

NationalDharmasthala mass grave probe: SIT nears end of excavation with final 3 sites today