City
Epaper

Pragya Thakur did not notice construction work: NIA court on cleanliness complain

By ANI | Updated: June 20, 2019 19:45 IST

Days after Malegaon blast case accused Pragya Thakur had complained about lack of proper seating and cleanliness in the courtroom, the NIA court on Thursday said she 'deliberately' did not notice the construction work happening at the court.

Open in App

Days after Malegaon blast case accused Pragya Thakur had complained about lack of proper seating and cleanliness in the courtroom, the NIA court on Thursday said she 'deliberately' did not notice the construction work happening at the court.

Thakur, the BJP MP from Bhopal, had created a scene in the special NIA court on June 7 by standing throughout the proceedings complaining about lack of proper chair and cleanliness.

The Court also rejected Thakur's plea for a permanent exemption from appearing in the court saying, "The health grounds, not having a house near Mumbai, attending parliament session, etc were not reasonable grounds."

Pragya Thakur's counsel told the court that as an MP, she needs to attend the Parliament and listen to the party whip. However, there was no paperwork.

The judge noted that attending Parliament is necessary and granted an exemption to Thakur for today. It also said that the court may consider a fresh application if filed tomorrow.

The court had on June 3 directed Thakur and all other accused in the case to appear before it once a week.

Besides Thakur, Lt Col Prasad Purohit, retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Ajay Rahirkar, Sameer Kulkarni and Sudhakar Chaturvedi are also accused in the case.

They have been charged under various sections of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), relevant sections of the Explosive Substances Act, and relevant sections of Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The charges include sections 16 (committing terrorist act) and 18 (conspiring to commit terrorist act) of the UAPA and sections 120 (b) (criminal conspiracy), 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 153 (a) (promoting enmity between two religious groups) of the IPC.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: Pragya ThakurSudhakar DwivediSudhakar Chaturvediparliament
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2008 Malegaon Bomb Blast Case Verdict: All Accused, Including Sadhvi Pragya Thakur, Acquitted by NIA Court

MaharashtraMalegaon Blast Case Verdict: Security Beefed Up Outside NIA Court in Mumbai (Watch Video)

Maharashtra2008 Malegaon Blast Case Verdict Likely Today, Court To Decide Fate of BJP Leader Pragya Thakur

National'Maunvrat, Maunvrat': Shashi Tharoor Evades Question On Operation Sindoor Debate in Parliament (Watch Video)

NationalCentral Government Employees Can Avail 30 Days Leave for Personal Reasons, Including Elderly Care: Centre

National Realted Stories

NationalIntense thunderstorms likely again in Hyderabad today

NationalChhattisgarh to launch 'Gaudham Yojana', cowherds to get Rs 10,916 per month

NationalFarmers slam poor canal maintenance in TN's Madurai ahead of Samba paddy season

NationalHistoric leap for Rajasthan’s dairy sector, first sex sorted semen lab to begin operation tomorrow

NationalPM Modi flags off three Vande Bharat trains, inaugurates Bengaluru-Belagavi service