City
Epaper

Rajasthan JJM scam: Retired IAS officer’s lawyer withdraws, petition to quash FIR put on hold

By IANS | Updated: February 23, 2026 20:20 IST

Jaipur, Feb 23 Retired IAS officer Subodh Agarwal's lawyer, facing allegations in the Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) scam ...

Open in App

Jaipur, Feb 23 Retired IAS officer Subodh Agarwal's lawyer, facing allegations in the Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) scam case, has received another jolt as his lawyer Deepak Chauhan has withdrawn from the case just days after filing a petition in the Rajasthan High Court seeking to quash the FIR registered by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB).

Chauhan filed the petition on February 19 on behalf of Agarwal, but submitted an application on February 21 to withdraw his power of attorney. The petition was expected to be heard this week, but with the lawyer stepping away, the case will now be listed only after a new counsel files a fresh power of attorney.

Earlier, on February 18, a lookout notice was issued against Subodh Agarwal to prevent him from leaving the country.

The ACB is currently searching for him in connection with the ongoing investigation into alleged irregularities in JJM tenders.

In the petition, Agarwal claimed that 95 per cent of the tenders were approved by the Finance Committee headed by then Additional Chief Secretary (ACS) Sudhansh Pant.

He stated that his tenure at the Public Health Engineering Department (PHED) began on April 18, 2022, and that tenders for firms Ganpati Tubewell and Shyam Tubewell were awarded before his tenure using allegedly fake IRCON certificates.

He further claimed that tenders worth less than 10 per cent of the total value were approved during his tenure, but the ACB did not examine this aspect.

Agarwal stated that no payments were released to the accused firms during his tenure, and therefore, no financial loss was caused to the government.

He said that after receiving an email from IRCON, he constituted a high-level committee, following which tenders of both firms were cancelled, they were blacklisted, and legal action was taken against officer Vishal Saxena.

The petition also alleged that the ACB action is based on statements by Vishal Saxena, despite Agarwal having filed an FIR against him, suggesting personal animosity.

--IANS

arc/dan

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPleased that government is in touch with leaders in the region: Shashi Tharoor on West Asia conflictleased that our government is in touch with leaders in that region: Shashi Tharoor on West Asia conflict

PoliticsUttar Pradesh: CM Yogi fulfils promise of transferring ownership rights to 331 families displaced from Bangladesh

NationalTN polls: Booth slip distribution to begin today ahead of April 23 voting

NationalRahul Gandhi flags off 'Run For Ambedkar, Run For Constitution' marathon in Delhi, alleges bid to undermine Constitution

InternationalIraqi parliament elects former environment minister Nizar Amedi as country's new president

National Realted Stories

NationalCM Bhajanlal attends "Vyapar Rajasthan 2026" event, targets Congress over appeasement politics

NationalAssembly of second TBM begins at Sawli for Mumbai Ahmedabad Bullet Train Project

National"RG Kar incident has shamed Bengal...": Amit Shah slams Trinamool Congress government

NationalVoting for TTAADC elections in Tripura today across 28 seats

NationalKTR slams Revanth Reddy, says he will be remembered as a 'Leader Who Deceived All'