City
Epaper

Saradha scam: Court questions ED’s 3rd supplementary charge sheet naming Nalini Chidambaram

By IANS | Updated: July 5, 2024 18:10 IST

Kolkata, July 5 The ED on Friday submitted its third supplementary charge sheet in the Saradha chit fund ...

Open in App

Kolkata, July 5 The ED on Friday submitted its third supplementary charge sheet in the Saradha chit fund case in West Bengal, naming Nalini Chidambaram there.

Nalini Chidambaram is the wife of Congress Rajya Sabha member and former Union Finance Minister, P Chidambaram.

However, the special court has not accepted the charge sheet as yet, raising some technical questions regarding the inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name.

The court observed that cognisance in the matter would be established only after the central agency furnishes more substantiating documents on this count to it.

Sources said that the ED counsel, on Friday afternoon submitted a 1,100-page compiled document at the special court of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in Kolkata, which included the main charge sheet of 65 pages.

Sources said the central agency has claimed that Nalini Chidambaram received Rs 1.5 crore from Saradha Group’s founder chairman Sudipta Sen.

The ED has further claimed, that although Nalini Chidambaram has said that she received the money as legal consultancy fee as a tax consultant, she could not furnish any supporting documents for that.

However, after the charge sheet was submitted the judge of the special court raised some technical questions on inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name, besides questioning the central agency on why the third supplementary charge sheet was submitted after 11 years.

On the inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name, the special court questioned how a tax consultant is considered involved in corruption charges if he or she accepts consultancy fees as a professional from a client.

The court also questioned whether any advocate taking the brief on behalf of a person accused of a crime could be considered as a partner in crime.

Finally, the judge observed that he will take cognisance in the matter only if the central agency submits more substantiating proof in the matter to the satisfaction of the court.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

CricketAsia Cup: Nissanka achieves most fifty-plus scores by Sri Lankan batter in T20Is

EntertainmentEOW records Raj Kundra's statement in alleged Rs 60 crore cheating case

Other SportsSkater Anandkumar Velkumar makes history, gets India first-ever gold at Speed Skating World C'ships

CricketShashank Singh: Should Team India use PBKS star's death-overs hitting skills?

BusinessITR filing deadline extended by a day to Sep 16

National Realted Stories

NationalITR filing deadline extended by a day to Sep 16

NationalMadhya Pradesh: Ex-Cong minister Kamaleshwar Patel expresses disappointment over party infighting

NationalMaha CM to develop a comprehensive policy for cancer treatment

NationalMaha govt approves corpus fund for health treatment of over Rs 5 lakh, says CM Fadnavis

NationalBihar Minister asks Tejashwi to apologise or face legal action in YouTuber assault case