City
Epaper

Saradha scam: Court questions ED’s 3rd supplementary charge sheet naming Nalini Chidambaram

By IANS | Updated: July 5, 2024 18:10 IST

Kolkata, July 5 The ED on Friday submitted its third supplementary charge sheet in the Saradha chit fund ...

Open in App

Kolkata, July 5 The ED on Friday submitted its third supplementary charge sheet in the Saradha chit fund case in West Bengal, naming Nalini Chidambaram there.

Nalini Chidambaram is the wife of Congress Rajya Sabha member and former Union Finance Minister, P Chidambaram.

However, the special court has not accepted the charge sheet as yet, raising some technical questions regarding the inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name.

The court observed that cognisance in the matter would be established only after the central agency furnishes more substantiating documents on this count to it.

Sources said that the ED counsel, on Friday afternoon submitted a 1,100-page compiled document at the special court of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in Kolkata, which included the main charge sheet of 65 pages.

Sources said the central agency has claimed that Nalini Chidambaram received Rs 1.5 crore from Saradha Group’s founder chairman Sudipta Sen.

The ED has further claimed, that although Nalini Chidambaram has said that she received the money as legal consultancy fee as a tax consultant, she could not furnish any supporting documents for that.

However, after the charge sheet was submitted the judge of the special court raised some technical questions on inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name, besides questioning the central agency on why the third supplementary charge sheet was submitted after 11 years.

On the inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name, the special court questioned how a tax consultant is considered involved in corruption charges if he or she accepts consultancy fees as a professional from a client.

The court also questioned whether any advocate taking the brief on behalf of a person accused of a crime could be considered as a partner in crime.

Finally, the judge observed that he will take cognisance in the matter only if the central agency submits more substantiating proof in the matter to the satisfaction of the court.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalTwo US Judges order Trump administration to use emergency funds for food aid during shutdown

International"Christianity facing an existential threat in Nigeria," Trump puts country on US watch list

InternationalFBI Director says potential 'terror attack' averted in Michigan

Entertainment"There is a generational leap": Shweta Basu Prasad teases her character in Huma Qureshi starrer 'Maharani Season 4'

InternationalIndia closely monitoring presence of "extra regional powers" in Indian Ocean, says Navy Vice Chief

National Realted Stories

NationalDularchand Yadav murder case: Doctor rules out bullet injury as cause of death

NationalHaryana: 78th Nirankari Sant Samagam in Samalkha draws devotees from 25 countries; over 1 lakh volunteers serve langar

NationalOdisha: 8 get life term for murder of man over political rivalry in Dhenkanal

NationalUnion Minister Bandi Sanjay demands apology from Telangana CM

NationalDrug trafficking case: ED seizes property records after multi-city search operations