City
Epaper

Saradha scam: Court questions ED’s 3rd supplementary charge sheet naming Nalini Chidambaram

By IANS | Updated: July 5, 2024 18:10 IST

Kolkata, July 5 The ED on Friday submitted its third supplementary charge sheet in the Saradha chit fund ...

Open in App

Kolkata, July 5 The ED on Friday submitted its third supplementary charge sheet in the Saradha chit fund case in West Bengal, naming Nalini Chidambaram there.

Nalini Chidambaram is the wife of Congress Rajya Sabha member and former Union Finance Minister, P Chidambaram.

However, the special court has not accepted the charge sheet as yet, raising some technical questions regarding the inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name.

The court observed that cognisance in the matter would be established only after the central agency furnishes more substantiating documents on this count to it.

Sources said that the ED counsel, on Friday afternoon submitted a 1,100-page compiled document at the special court of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in Kolkata, which included the main charge sheet of 65 pages.

Sources said the central agency has claimed that Nalini Chidambaram received Rs 1.5 crore from Saradha Group’s founder chairman Sudipta Sen.

The ED has further claimed, that although Nalini Chidambaram has said that she received the money as legal consultancy fee as a tax consultant, she could not furnish any supporting documents for that.

However, after the charge sheet was submitted the judge of the special court raised some technical questions on inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name, besides questioning the central agency on why the third supplementary charge sheet was submitted after 11 years.

On the inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name, the special court questioned how a tax consultant is considered involved in corruption charges if he or she accepts consultancy fees as a professional from a client.

The court also questioned whether any advocate taking the brief on behalf of a person accused of a crime could be considered as a partner in crime.

Finally, the judge observed that he will take cognisance in the matter only if the central agency submits more substantiating proof in the matter to the satisfaction of the court.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentPriyanka Chopra wishes baby brother Siddharth Chopra on his birthday with a perfect family pic

Cricket“Somebody’s Wife Is Calling”: Jasprit Bumrah’s Witty Reaction Goes Viral As Reporter’s Phone Rings During Press Conference at Lord’s (Watch Video)

NationalNamibian female Cheetah Nabha succumbs to injuries

BusinessMASSH-PROLIFE Hospital Launches 'Obesity-Free Punjab' Campaign to Tackle State's Growing Health Crisis

ThaneThane: 16-Year-Old Attacks Autorickshaw Driver with Geometry Compass to Foil Kidnapping Bid, Jumps Out of Moving Vehicle

National Realted Stories

NationalCBI registers case in custodial death of temple guard in TN's Sivaganga

NationalMangaluru: Two employees die, another critical due to toxic gas leak at MRPL

NationalTwo dead in Delhi building collapse; CM Gupta offers condolences

NationalUnder fire for rising crime, Bihar Deputy CM blames Oppn RJD

NationalUnder PM Modi, India continues to champion the cause of Global South