City
Epaper

SC adjourns hearing on Bombay HC's reduced working hours in view of COVID-19

By ANI | Updated: January 27, 2022 15:50 IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned a hearing on a plea challenging circular issued by the Bombay High Court reducing its working hours to three hours a day in view of COVID-19.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned a hearing on a plea challenging circular issued by the Bombay High Court reducing its working hours to three hours a day in view of COVID-19.

A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud listed the matter for February 4 for hearing.

The plea filed by activist Ghanshyam Upadhyay stated that due to the Standard Operating Procedure(SOP), the principal bench of the High Court has been "functioning only for namesake" causing hardships to the litigants and advocates.

According to the SOP issued on January 10, 2022, the High Court will function from 12 noon-3 pm without a lunch break from Monday to Friday starting from January 11 to 28.

It stated that courts can be made functional through a virtual hearing without reducing the working hours.

The plea said that the fundamental rights of citizens are being jeopardised and violated and it was a matter of great concern and public importance.

"The reason seems to reduce the risk for all concerned being infected with new variants, however, it has been forgotten that if all the courts are made functional for three hours in a day, then also such risk is enviable," it added.

The plea while seeking direction to the Bombay High court to form guidelines and ensure the virtual functioning of all courts in the State also said that virtual hearings can increase the disposal rate of cases and are the future of court proceedings.

According to the plea, another SOP has directed that from January 3, subordinate courts in Mumbai, Pune, Raigad and Alibaug to function between 11 am and 4 pm with 50 per cent of staff on rotation and to hear remand, bail and urgent matters through physical hearing.

The matters for recording evidence and hearing arguments were directed to be taken through a virtual platform.

The plea claimed that there are no requisite infrastructures in these courts for hearing matters through the virtual platform.

It sought directions to all courts in the State to function full time through the virtual platform by laying down guidelines without curtailing the court working hours.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtBombay High CourtDy ChandrachudGhanshyam upadhyay
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiBombay HC Orders DNA Test of Seafarer Dixit Solanki Killed in Oman Drone Attack

MumbaiMumbai Police Arrest Jamtara Man in Rs 6 Lakh Cyber Fraud Case Targeting Bombay High Court Judge

CricketBombay High Court Allows Raj Kundra to Challenge UK Order in Rajasthan Royals Stake Dispute

MumbaiMumbai Bomb Threat Emails Traced to Bangladesh IP; Sender Used VPN to Hide Location

MumbaiMumbai on Alert After Threatening Email Warns of Bomb Blasts at BSE, High Court, Metro and Banks

National Realted Stories

National"Iran has won": Shia Markazi Chand Committee president Syed Saif Abbas Naqvi on Trump's ceasefire move

National"Won't only benefit women but whole country": KGMU Vice Chancellor Soniya Nityanand on Women Reservation Bill

NationalPM Modi highlights 11 years of PMMY, calls it a boost to self-employment among youth

NationalTN polls: Vijay to campaign in Tirunelveli today amid strict police conditions

NationalFirst-time voters surge by 33 pc in TN ahead of Assembly polls