City
Epaper

SC agrees to urgently list plea against new UGC equity regulations

By IANS | Updated: January 28, 2026 11:50 IST

New Delhi, Jan 28 The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to list for hearing a plea challenging the ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 28 The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to list for hearing a plea challenging the University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026.

When the matter was mentioned for urgent listing, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant assured the petitioner’s counsel that the case would be heard after defects in the petition are cured.

The counsel submitted that the regulations could result in discrimination against individuals in the general category and expressed concern over the denial of effective grievance redressal mechanisms for them.

In response, CJI Kant said that the apex court was aware of the issue.

“We know what’s happening. Make sure defects are cured. We will list it,” the CJI said.

The plea challenges the UGC’s Equity Regulations, alleging that the framework institutionalises discrimination by denying grievance redressal mechanisms to persons belonging to non-SC/ST/OBC categories.

It contended that the regulations violate the principles of equality and fair access to remedies in higher education institutions.

According to the petition, the regulation restricts the scope of “caste-based discrimination” only to members of the "Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes”.

Such a definition “accords legal recognition of victimhood exclusively to certain reserved categories and categorically excludes persons belonging to general or upper castes from its protective ambit, regardless of the nature, gravity, or context of discrimination suffered by them”.

The petition further seeks a direction to ensure that Equal Opportunity Centres, Equity Helplines, inquiry mechanisms and Ombudsperson proceedings under the regulations are made available in a “non-discriminatory and caste-neutral manner”, pending reconsideration or amendment of Regulation 3(c).

It argued that denial of access to grievance redressal mechanisms on the basis of caste identity amounts to impermissible state discrimination and violates Articles 14, 15(1) and 21 of the Constitution.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

International"One of the most daring CSAR operation in US history": Trump hails rescue of downed F-15 colonel in Iran

InternationalCIA’s 'deception campaign', covert hunt key to rescue of US jet pilot in Iran

National"People's government will return, transform Adilabad by 2034": Telangana CM Revanth Reddy

NationalEight-year-old girl sexually assaulted in Delhi's Aman Vihar, accused held under POCSO Act

PoliticsBJP Govt & police must come out of their anti-Dalit mindset: AAP's Saurabh Bharadwaj

National Realted Stories

NationalTN polls: Scrutiny of nominations papers begins today

National"Middle East conflict hits Uttarakhand industries, raises costs": IAU President Pankaj Gupta

NationalLight rain lashes Delhi, IMD forecasts thunderstorms, gusty winds throughout day

NationalIMD forecasts rain across parts of Tamil Nadu, Puducherry

NationalMumbai Police seize drugs worth Rs 7.69 crore; smuggler held