City
Epaper

SC asks lawyers to be physically present in court to argue case

By IANS | Updated: May 30, 2022 23:35 IST

New Delhi, May 30 The Supreme Court on Monday emphasised on the physical presence of lawyers during the ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 30 The Supreme Court on Monday emphasised on the physical presence of lawyers during the vacation to argue their matters, rather than using video conferencing facilities.

A vacation bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and B.V. Nagarathna said the judges are coming to the court everyday. "You can also come and argue your cases," it told a counsel appearing virtually. The bench said that lawyers who argue their cases physically would get its indulgence and adjourned few cases where lawyers appeared virtually.

The bench asked senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi to appear before the court and added that vacation in courts is not for senior lawyers. Singhvi said let there be a uniform rule saying that there should not be an Article 14 violation. At this, the bench replied: "When are you coming to the court?" The bench adjourned the matter after Singhvi replied he would come to the court on Tuesday.

The bench also did not entertain a request for an urgent hearing mentioned by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, who was appearing through video conferencing. The bench asked him to appear physically before it and pointed out that other lawyers are present in the courtroom. Rohatgi requested the bench to adjourn the matter for the day after tomorrow. Agreeing to his request, the bench told Rohatgi that if he is busy, then he can ask his colleague to appear before the court physically.

Another counsel, who appeared virtually, cited the top court's recent circular, which allowed hybrid option where both physical and virtual is allowed is provided to the lawyers and litigants. The bench told him to be physically present in the court to argue his matter.

Another lawyer, who had gone to Kerala due to some exigency, requested the bench to allow him to argue the matter through video conferencing, but the judges did not agree. The bench told him: "Come here and argue your case."

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Mukul RohatgiAjay RastogiSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiDevendra Fadnavis Disagrees with Abrupt Closure of Mumbai’s Kabutarkhanas, Urges Regulated Measures to Mitigate Health Risks

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

National Realted Stories

NationalBarmer Refinery to redefine India’s petroleum self-reliance: Madan Rathore

NationalMP govt to hold one-day workshop on POCSO in Bhopal tomorrow

NationalGuwahati Airport's new terminal set to open in November: Assam CM

NationalAssam CM highlights stark disparities in girls’ education in state

National'Election fraud': Preparations underway in full swing for Rahul's event in Karnataka