City
Epaper

SC asks Punjab to ensure NDPS absconding offenders are brought to book within reasonable time

By ANI | Updated: May 26, 2022 22:10 IST

The Supreme Court while observing that there are over 2000 absconding NDPS offenders/accused persons in Punjab, has asked the state government to put in place appropriate provisions to ensure that the absconding individuals are brought to book within a reasonable time.

Open in App

The Supreme Court while observing that there are over 2000 absconding NDPS offenders/accused persons in Punjab, has asked the state government to put in place appropriate provisions to ensure that the absconding individuals are brought to book within a reasonable time.

A bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar and JB Pardiwala has observed that "NDPS matter is not a usual matter" and noted that there are over 2000 absconding NDPS offenders and accused persons in Punjab.

The apex court further observed that if there is a failure to book the offenders within a reasonable time, the concerned police officer proceeds departmentally.

Advocate General Anmol Rattan Sidhu, for Punjab, assured the bench that the needful shall be done as regards the timelines and for action against the erring official.

In its order, the top court noted the submissions of Sidhu that all essential steps will be taken to ensure that the absconding offenders/accused person are brought to book within a reasonable time and failing which the officer, who is made personally liable in terms of the order shall be proceeded with departmentally for the acts of commission and omission.

The apex court hearing a matter relating to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS), posted it for hearing on July 7 and asked the government to file the status report before the next date of hearing.

"Assurance is given by the Advocate General on behalf of the respondent-State that all essential steps will be taken to ensure that the absconding offenders/accused person are brought to book within a reasonable time and failing which the Officer, who is made personally liable in terms of the order shall be proceeded with departmentally for the acts of commission and omission," the bench stated in its order.

"Accordingly, we post these matters on July 7, 2022. Further status report be filed well-in-advance," the bench stated further.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Jb pardiwalaSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiDevendra Fadnavis Disagrees with Abrupt Closure of Mumbai’s Kabutarkhanas, Urges Regulated Measures to Mitigate Health Risks

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

National Realted Stories

NationalUddhav Thackeray's Saamana questions SC's 'true Indian' observation on Rahul Gandhi

NationalHimachal Pradesh Weather Update: IMD Predicts Heavy Rainfall in Bilaspur, Shimla, Solan, Sirmaur and Mandi

NationalRBI Keeps Repo Rate Unchanged at 5.5%; Neutral Stance to Continue Says Sanjay Malhotra

NationalIMD forecasts extremely heavy rainfall in Kerala today

NationalPM Modi dials U'khand CM Dhami, takes stock of situation in Uttarkashi