City
Epaper

SC directs to give representation before EC on plea to give relevant info about candidate's criminal antecedents

By ANI | Updated: March 3, 2023 21:00 IST

The Supreme Court on Friday directed the petitioner to give representation before Election Commission with his plea seeking the ...

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Friday directed the petitioner to give representation before Election Commission with his plea seeking the candidate's criminal antecedents, assets and liabilities and educational qualifications.

The court said that the petitioner is at liberty to file a representation with the election commission.

With this direction, a bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud disposed of the plea filed by doctor Adwaita Gahlot Kapur and Advocate Sanjana Gahlot.

The court was hearing a petition seeking information concerning criminal antecedents and assets of contesting candidates to be made available to voters.

The plea filed by doctor Adwaita Gahlot Kapur and Advocate Sanjana Gahlot sought to make the list of contesting candidates prepared and published under section 38 of the Representation of People Act, 1951) vibrant and effective by putting the relevant information on the candidate's criminal antecedents (if any), assets and liabilities, educational qualifications.

The petition also urged to prepare and Publish the List of Contesting Candidateswith relevant information at a conspicuous place at the polling station, and to prepare the list in audio and video form and play it at the polling station.

The petitioner also sought to include Economic Offences and a history of Assets and liabilities on the Affidavit filled by Contesting Candidates.

"This petition is related to falling standards of Parliamentarians and State Legislators. The main reason for these degrading standards is that the Voters/electors/public is kept in dark about the relevant information (identified by the Apex Court in the ADR case 2002) about the candidates they are going to elect. And the solution lies in putting this relevant information (buried in affidavits) on THE LIST OF CONTESTING CANDIDATES prepared and published under Section 38 of Representation of People Act, 1951," the plea said.

The Respondent, Commission has deprived the voter of their Fundamental Right to know the relevant information about the Candidates they are going to Vote for by not publishing the relevant information on the LIST OF CONTESTING CANDIDATES prepared and published under section 38 of the Representation of People Act, 1951, the petition said.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Sanjana gahlotSupreme CourtElection CommissionSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelCanadian supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentSamay Raina and Four Others Summoned by Supreme Court Over Mocking Disabled Individuals

NationalSC Rejects Red Fort Claim by Woman Posing as Mughal Heir: ‘Why Not Fatehpur Sikri Too?’

MumbaiBadlapur Encounter Case: Supreme Court Stays FIR Against Thane Police in Akshay Shinde Death

ThaneBadlapur School Sexual Assault Case: FIR Still Pending as HC Deadline Passes

MaharashtraUPSC Cheating Case: Pooja Khedkar Denies Allegations of Exam Fraud, Name Change and Fake Disability Certificate

National Realted Stories

NationalNSA Doval meets PM Modi amid escalating India-Pak tensions over Pahalgam terror attack

NationalIndia’s services sector grows steadily in April, composite PMI hits 8-month high

NationalTelangana: Bajrang Dal opposes Miss World pageant in war-like situation

NationalPolice resort to lathi-charge as BPSC aspirants attempt to enter prohibited zone in Patna

NationalFocus on voters, not inner circles: JP Nadda to Rajasthan ministers, MLAs