City
Epaper

SC dismisses Bihar Independent candidate's plea challenging rejection of nomination form

By IANS | Updated: May 31, 2024 18:40 IST

New Delhi, May 31 The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed, as withdrawn, the plea filed by an independent ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 31 The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed, as withdrawn, the plea filed by an independent candidate from Bihar's Jehanabad Lok Sabha constituency challenging the rejection of his nomination form.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Aravind Kumar told petitioner Abhishek Dangi to file a letter patent appeal before the high court or rather, institute an election petition in the matter.

Sensing the disinclination of the apex court, counsel representing the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the matter. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to exhaust the other available alternative remedies.

The special leave petition, filed through advocate Suvidutt M.S., alleged that the petitioner’s nomination form was rejected due to ulterior and hidden motives of the local administration which can only be cured by the apex court since he has lost hope in the government and electoral machinery.

On May 21, the Patna High Court dismissed Dangi's writ petition challenging the rejection of his nomination papers by the District Magistrate-cum-Returning Officer.

"A suit, an appeal or a writ petition challenging the acceptance or rejection of nomination paper in an election to Central or State legislature is not competent. In view of the pronouncement of law by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, this writ petition is dismissed as being not maintainable," said a single-judge bench of Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh.

The plea said that the petitioner’s nomination form was rejected for not answering Question No. 8(ii) B which was a follow-up question in case the answer to Question 8 (ii) A was "Yes" but the applicable and correct answer in Petitioner’s case is “No" as he has not stayed in accommodation provided by the government at any time during the last ten years before the date of notification of the current election.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalIRCTC scam case: Delhi High Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu, Tejashwi

NationalJagan calls arrest of TV journalists an attack on freedom of press

CricketMitchell continues fine run against India with century during 2nd Rajkot ODI

AurangabadSea of blue surged near university to pay homage to Dr Ambedkar & martyrs

Other SportsIndian cyclists touch down in Pune ahead of historic Pune Grand Tour 2026

National Realted Stories

NationalK'taka BJP seeks special session discussion on drug mafia instead of VB-G RAM-G

NationalOdisha: BJD slams BJP-govt over holding party meetings in government offices

NationalPatna Police arrest man for killing wife; aide also held

NationalHM Shah performs bhoomi pujan for redevelopment of Surya Apartment in Ahmedabad

NationalMagh Mela 2026: Prayagraj witnesses massive pilgrim turnout