City
Epaper

SC expects West Bengal Speaker to decide on disqualification plea against Mukul Roy soon

By ANI | Updated: November 22, 2021 18:00 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday said it expects the West Bengal Legislative Assembly Speaker Biman Banerjee would take a call on the disqualification petition moved against Trinamool Congress (TMC) MLA Mukul Roy and posted the matter for hearing before it in the third week of January 2022.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Monday said it expects the West Bengal Legislative Assembly Speaker Biman Banerjee would take a call on the disqualification petition moved against Trinamool Congress (TMC) MLA Mukul Roy and posted the matter for hearing before it in the third week of January 2022.

A bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Hima Kohli also observed that there is a general practice of Speakers delaying the hearing of defection petitions under the Tenth Schedule of the constitution.

"There are so many cases where there is a delay by the Speaker... We are told you stay away, let the Speaker decide," Justice Rao observed.

The apex court was hearing two separate appeals by the Assembly Speaker and the Secretary and the Returning Officer of West Bengal Assembly, against the Calcutta High Court order.

The High Court had directed the Speaker to decide by October 7 the petition seeking Roy's disqualification for his defection from BJP to TMC. The order of High Court had come on plea moved by BJP MLA Ambika Roy challenging the appointment of TMC MLA Mukul Roy as the Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly.

On June 17, a disqualification petition had also been moved before the Speaker by BJP MLA and Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari against Mukul Roy on the grounds of defection.

During the hearing before the top court, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing for the Speaker told the Bench that the Speaker had fixed December 21 as the next date of hearing of the disqualification petition filed by Adhikari against Mukul Roy.

Taking into note that the petition for disqualification is now listed before the Speaker on December 21, the Bench said, "We hope the Speaker proceeds with the hearing of the matter and decides the matter in accordance with the law."

In its September 28 order, the Calcutta High Court had observed that it is a constitutional convention to appoint the Leader of the Opposition as the Chairman of the PAC and ruled that the issue pertaining to disqualification of Roy as Member of the Legislative Assembly is co-related with him being the Chairman of the PAC.

Speaker of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly had then moved the Supreme Court challenging the direction to decide on the disqualification petition against Roy.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtBiman BanerjeeHima kohliWest bengal legislative assembly
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

MumbaiMumbai: Retired Bank Manager, Family Held in ‘Digital Arrest’ for 35 Days; ₹1.83 Crore Lost to Cyber Fraud in Mulund

InternationalDonald Trump's Global Tariffs Illegal : US Supreme Court Deals Major Blow to President

EntertainmentNeeraj Pandey Drops ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ Title; Supreme Court Closes Case

InternationalRamadan 2026 Moon Sighting in Saudi Arabia: Supreme Court of KSA Calls on Muslims to Search for Crescent on THIS Date

National Realted Stories

NationalGujarat: Ambaji to become ‘two-day destination'; project to recreate Nakki Lake ambiance

NationalWHO calls for science-led action and a stronger 'One Health' approach to address evolving health risks

NationalDevotees throng Mahakaleshwar Temple in Ujjain on Vaishakh Krishna Paksha Panchami

NationalTamil Nadu: Congress chief Selvaperunthagai asks EPS to apologise for Sathankulam custodial death case

NationalBengal SIR: 91 lakh names likely to be deleted as judicial adjudication process concludes