City
Epaper

SC gives Maha govt two weeks time to respond to lawyer Surendra Gadling’s bail plea

By IANS | Updated: December 4, 2024 18:30 IST

New Delhi, Dec 4 The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted the Maharashtra government two weeks’ time to file ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 4 The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted the Maharashtra government two weeks’ time to file a counter affidavit to the bail plea filed by lawyer Surendra Gadling, who is behind bars in connection with the 2016 Surjagarh iron ore mine arson case.

A bench, headed by Justice M.M. Sundresh, was hearing a special leave petition filed by Gadling against the dismissal of his appeal filed under Section 21(4) of the NIA (National Investigation Agency) Act seeking bail.

The counsel representing the Maharashtra government sought a "last chance" to file the counter-affidavit in the matter, explaining that the translation of vernacular documents was taking time.

Senior advocate Anand Grover, representing Gadling, apprised the Bench, also comprising Justice Aravind Kumar, that the Maharashtra government has sought adjournment on eight occasions so far.

Gadling has been behind bars for five years and ten months while the trial remains at a very nascent stage, he said.

At this, the apex court said: "A matter like this needs to be heard. This is not a normal case. We will give a fixed date. List after two weeks."

In October last year, the top court had agreed to examine Gadling’s plea and called for a response from the Maharashtra government. The anti-terror agency charged Gadling for allegedly entering into a criminal conspiracy with Maoist rebels to set ablaze 76 trucks which were carrying iron ore from Surajgarh mines in Maharashtra. He is further alleged to be involved in the Bhima Koregaon-Elgaar Parishad violence - where clashes erupted between various caste groups after "provocative" speeches were given by the activists of Kabir Kala Manch on December 31, 2017, in Pune.

Gadling had claimed that he is a criminal law practitioner with over 25 years of practice and was falsely implicated in the case, adding that there is no prima facie case against him and the evidence brought on record by the prosecution is neither reliable nor admissible.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessPayG Secures RBI Approval for Offline and Cross-Border Payment Aggregation - A Key Milestone in Its Payment Journey

InternationalInstability in Iran sparks concern in New Delhi over Chabahar Port

Other SportsViksit Bharat Young Leaders Dialogue inaugurated at Bharat Mandapam; Mandaviya, Ajit Doval address youths

EntertainmentGeorge Clooney reveals the song Paul McCartney sang for him in private performance

NationalViksit Bharat Young Leaders Dialogue inaugurated at Bharat Mandapam; Mandaviya, Ajit Doval address youths

National Realted Stories

National10 lakh students to benefit by Feb end under TN govt's laptop scheme

NationalBJP govt acting too late, seems like giving scapegoat route to Ankita’s killers: Cong

NationalMagh Mela 2026: UP CM Adityanath offers prayers at holy Ganga river in Prayagraj

NationalHD Kumaraswamy thanks Mansukh Mandaviya for sanctioning multi-purpose sports facility in K'taka

NationalFrom drones to women couriers: How Pakistan is rewiring narco-terror pipeline in J&K