New Delhi, March 11 The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice on a plea challenging the Madras High Court order which had held that downloading and possessing child pornography does not amount to any offence.
A bench, headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, sought the response of the Tamil Nadu government and others in the matter within four weeks.
In January, the Madras High Court had quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against a 28-year-old Chennai man, holding that watching child pornography in private would not fall within the scope of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
A bench of Justice N. Anand Venkatesh reasoned that the accused had merely downloaded the material and watched the pornography in privacy and it was neither published nor transmitted to others.
"Since he has not used a child or children for pornographic purposes, at best, it can only be construed as a moral decay on the part of the accused person."
The Chennai police registered an FIR under Sections 67 B of the Information Technology Act and Section 14(1) of the POCSO Act after it seized the phone of the accused and discovered that he had downloaded and possessed child pornography.
In India, both the POCSO Act 2012 and the IT Act 2000, along with other laws, criminalise the creation, distribution, and possession of child pornography.
Senior advocate H.S. Phoolka, assisted by advocate Saksham Maheswari, represented the appellants - Just Rights for Children Alliance, a coalition of NGOs, and the Bachpan Bachao Andolan.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor