City
Epaper

SC judge recuses from hearing Gadling's bail plea in Surjagarh iron ore mine arson case

By IANS | Updated: April 2, 2026 16:35 IST

New Delhi, April 2 A judge of the Supreme Court on Thursday recused himself from hearing a bail ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 2 A judge of the Supreme Court on Thursday recused himself from hearing a bail plea filed by lawyer and activist Surendra Gadling in connection with the 2016 Surajgarh iron ore mine arson case.

Justice Atul S. Chandurkar, who was part of a bench headed by Justice J.K. Maheshwari, withdrew from the matter when it was taken up for hearing.

The development comes after an earlier recusal by Justice M.M. Sundresh in the same case.

Following the recusal, the matter is expected to be placed before an appropriate Bench, as per directions of the Chief Justice of India (CJI), who is the master of the roster.

The apex court has been hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Gadling challenging the rejection of his bail plea under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act.

During the previous hearing, a Bench of Justices Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi had adjourned the matter, indicating that timelines could be fixed to ensure that the trial does not suffer further delays.

The case pertains to the alleged arson incident in 2016, where 76 trucks transporting iron ore from the Surajgarh mines in Maharashtra were set ablaze.

The prosecution has alleged that Gadling was part of a larger conspiracy involving Maoist operatives. He has also been linked by the investigating agency to the Bhima Koregaon-Elgaar Parishad violence that occurred in Pune in December 2017.

On the other hand, Gadling has denied the allegations, contending that he is a criminal lawyer with over 25 years of practice and has been falsely implicated. He has maintained that there is no prima facie evidence against him and that the material relied upon by the prosecution is neither reliable nor admissible.

In earlier proceedings, the Supreme Court had issued notice on his plea and sought a response from the Maharashtra government. The hearing in the matter had seen multiple adjournments, including on account of delays in filing replies and translation of documents.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Other SportsPakistan star Fakhar Zaman denies retiring from T20I format: Report

AurangabadDangerous potholes on Jalna Road;

NationalTN polls: Vijay's dual nominations cleared after affidavit corrections as initial discrepancies trigger row

Aurangabad‘Hanuman Katha’ to be held in city for the first time

AurangabadBITSAT- aspirants worried over clash of shedule with MHT- CET

National Realted Stories

NationalDelhi: CISF takes over security of RRTS 'Namo Bharat' Corridor

NationalAI Summit protest case: Delhi police files reply, opposes Manish Sharma's anticipatory bail plea

NationalCommitted to delivering healthcare at doorsteps, says Punjab CM

NationalCongress MP KC Venugopal demands "unconditional apology" from Assam CM over remarks against Mallikarjun Kharge

National'Terrorists look like angels to Congress': Karnataka BJP hits back at Kharge over 'anti-RSS' remark