New Delhi [India], April 3 : The Supreme Court on Friday modified its order passed on Thursday, by which it had granted relief to around 2.21 lakh candidates by permitting them to provisionally appear in the Rajasthan Sub-Inspector (SI)/Platoon Commander Recruitment Examination 2025.
The earlier order was passed on a plea filed by one candidate, Suraj Mal Meena, who had sought deferment of the examination by at least four weeks on the ground that he had been unable to appear for the exam scheduled on April 5-6.
On Friday, a special bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma modified the earlier order while hearing a plea filed by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, which expressed its inability to accommodate such a large number of candidates. The Court consequently restricted the relief only to the original applicant, Suraj Mal Meena, and not to the other candidates. It clarified that its earlier directions, particularly paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, would be confined only to Meena and would not extend to any other candidate.
The Court reasoned that, apart from Meena, no other candidate had approached it seeking similar relief. However, it clarified that the remaining candidates would be at liberty to approach the Court after the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court delivers its ruling on the issue.
During the hearing, the RPSC submitted that it had already issued admit cards to 713 candidates who had either approached the High Court or submitted representations to the Commission after being unable to appear for the examination. Counsel for the RPSC argued that Meena had misled the Court by seeking deferment of the exam despite already having been issued an admit card, along with around 700 similarly placed candidates.
The Court also noted that, apart from Meena, none of the 2.21 lakh candidates had appeared before it seeking relief. It therefore proceeded to modify its earlier order by limiting the benefit only to Meena.
In view of today's order, the examination will proceed as scheduled on April 5-6.
The apex court, however, clarified that those remaining candidates would be at liberty to approach the court after the Division Bench of the Rajasthan HC issued its ruling on the issue.
The issue on which the Rajasthan HC has reserved its decision relates to the age limit criteria, where the petitioner argued that several candidates have been excluded due to a lack of age relaxation.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor