City
Epaper

SC refuses to stay Karnataka HC order allowing trial against man for raping wife

By ANI | Updated: May 10, 2022 21:40 IST

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to stay the Karnataka High Court judgment which had refused to quash the case of marital rape filed against a husband on a complaint by his wife.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to stay the Karnataka High Court judgment which had refused to quash the case of marital rape filed against a husband on a complaint by his wife.

A bench of Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justice JK Maheshwari and Hima Kohli did not order a stay on the proceedings of the trial and issued notice on the appeal filed by the husband against the High Court order.

Senior advocate Siddharth Dave, appearing for the husband, told the bench that the trial in the case is starting from May 29. Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for the wife, opposed the appeal and submitted that the trial had been stayed for over five years and that the wife had been waiting indefinitely for the trial to commence.

The bench posted the matter for hearing in the third week of July.

The husband has challenged the order passed on March 23 this year by the High Court which had declined to quash the charge of rape framed under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against him accused of raping his wife and keeping her as a sex slave.

The High Court did not accept the husband's argument that the charge cannot be framed against him due to the exception to marital rape from the offence of rape as per exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code and observed that the exemption cannot be absolute.

"The brutal act of sexual assault on the wife, against her consent, albeit by the husband, cannot but be termed to be a rape. Such sexual assault by a husband on his wife will have grave consequences on the mental sheet of the wife, it has both psychological and physiological impact on her. Such acts of husbands scar the soul of the wives," the High Court had held.

While terming the exception for husbands under Section 375 IPC as regressive, the High Court had said that under the Code, every other man indulging in offences against women is punished for those offences. "A man is a man; an act is an act; rape is a rape, be it performed by a man the "husband" on the woman "wife"," it had said.

The wife filed the complaint against the husband on March 21, 2017, with the police. After the investigation, the Police filed a charge sheet against the husband under rape and other charges.

The Special Court framed charges against him alone in August 2018 for offences punishable under Sections 376, 498A and 506 of IPC and Section 5(m) and (l) read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Jitendra Kumar MaheshwariKarnataka High CourtSupreme CourtHima kohliSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 2% a Day After Telecom Sector Plunges on Supreme Court Order

EntertainmentHAQ’ Promotions Begin: Emraan Hashmi, Yami Gautam Dhar Recreate Film Poster at Supreme Court

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Crashes Over 10% After Superme Court’s Written Order on AGR Dues Sparks Confuson

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Price Fall 3% After SC AGR Relief; Experts Call It a Risky Buy

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Jumps 9%, Touches ₹10 After Supreme Court Grants Relief in AGR Dues

National Realted Stories

National'Gandhi family's history is full of vote chori': Nishikant Dubey on Rahul's allegations

NationalJ&K Police conduct raids across five districts in social media abuse case

NationalSIR in Bengal: ECI crackdown on BLAs, BLOs over 'irregularities'

NationalOur goal is to make India the most sustainable intelligence hub in world: Gautam Adani

NationalHeavy rain alert for southern TN; showers in Kanyakumari, Tenkasi