City
Epaper

SC reserves order on plea of death row convict, who claims to be kept in solitary confinement

By ANI | Updated: April 29, 2022 00:05 IST

The Supreme Court reserved the judgement on a petition of a death row convict challenging the Karnataka High Court order which dismissed his plea challenging the executability of his death sentence, pursuant to the rejection of his mercy petition filed before the President.

Open in App

The Supreme Court reserved the judgement on a petition of a death row convict challenging the Karnataka High Court order which dismissed his plea challenging the executability of his death sentence, pursuant to the rejection of his mercy petition filed before the President.

The convict has claimed to be kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him the death sentence.

A bench of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha reserved the order on convict BA Umesh's plea.

According to advocate Yug Mohit Chaudhry, appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner was kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him a death sentence.

A case was registered against Umesh on February 28, 1998 by Peenya Police under Sections 376 (rape) 302 (murder) and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. On October 27, 2006 the Sessions Court passed the sentence of death against the petitioner. On February 18. 2009 Karnataka High Court supported the imposition of the death sentence. On February 1, 2011, the Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and upheld the sentence of the death penalty passed on the petitioner.

On February 8, 2011, the petitioner's mother filed a mercy petition before the President, which was rejected on May 12, 2013.

Counsel of the petitioner had argued before Karnataka High Court that there has been an excessive and unexplained delay of 2 years and 3 months and 7 days, that is 827 days, in adjudicating the mercy petition thereby causing unnecessary and avoidable pain, suffering, and mental torment which is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Karnataka Government has opposed the submission that the accused has been kept insolitary confinement in jail.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Yug mohit chaudhryKarnataka High CourtSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalCrop Ruined by Parrots is 'Damage by Wild Animals', says HC; Gives Relief

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

MumbaiMumbai: Retired Bank Manager, Family Held in ‘Digital Arrest’ for 35 Days; ₹1.83 Crore Lost to Cyber Fraud in Mulund

InternationalDonald Trump's Global Tariffs Illegal : US Supreme Court Deals Major Blow to President

EntertainmentNeeraj Pandey Drops ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ Title; Supreme Court Closes Case

National Realted Stories

NationalMaha govt directs universities to upload degree certificates on DigiLocker before convocation

NationalSS(UBT) nominates Ambadas Danve for Maha Council polls, Uddhav Thackeray opts out

NationalAttempted to scare me, claims Trinamool MP Mitali Bag on car vandalism

NationalSikkim: 17 footballers call match with PM Modi an unforgettable experience

NationalZubeen Garg death probe: Court orders freezing of accounts linked to accused manager