City
Epaper

SC says it wants to conclude hearing on pleas challenging 2016 demonetisation this year, defers for Nov 24

By ANI | Updated: November 9, 2022 20:30 IST

The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday deferred for November 24 for hearing the pleas challenging the ...

Open in App

The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday deferred for November 24 for hearing the pleas challenging the Centre's decision to demonetize currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 in 2016 and said that they want to conclude the hearing on this issue this year.

A five-judge bench of Justices Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna was hearing pleas challenging the Centre's decision to demonetize currency notes of Rs. 500 and 1,000 in 2016.

Justice Nazeer fixed the matter for further hearing on 24th November. Justice Gavai said that they want to finish this matter this year.

Meanwhile, Attorney General R Venkataramani seeks a week's time to prepare the comprehensive affidavit that the court had directed to file in the last hearing.

In the last hearing, the Supreme Court's Constitution Bench has asked the Centre and RBI to file a comprehensive affidavit on the decision to demonetize currency notes of Rs. 500 and 1,000 in 2016.

Various petitions were filed arising from the decision of the Government of India to demonetize the old notes of Rs 500 and Rs1000. One of the petitions was filed by Vivek Narayan Sharma. The petition has challenged the notification dated November 8, 2016.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: R venkataramaniSupreme CourtAbdul NazeerSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

National Realted Stories

NationalTejashwi under cloud over ‘forged duplicate’ voter ID card: Election office source

NationalHours after realtor Gill joined BJP, Punjab Vigilance raids his residence, office

NationalHimachal Governor visits disaster-hit areas, expresses solidarity with victims

National‘Sole aim of Malegaon case was to defame Hindutva’: MP Minister after meeting Shyam Sahu

NationalPriyajit Ghosh, 22-Year-Old Bengal Cricketer, Dies of Heart Attack During Gym Session