City
Epaper

SC seeks Centre's reply on plea seeking benefits for gig workers of Zomato, Swiggy, Ola, Uber

By IANS | Updated: December 13, 2021 14:10 IST

New Delhi, Dec 13 The Supreme Court on Monday sought reply from the Centre on a plea seeking ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 13 The Supreme Court on Monday sought reply from the Centre on a plea seeking social security benefits for gig workers employed by online food delivery, taxi aggregators, courier applications such as Ola, Uber, Zomato, Swiggy, etc.

Senior advocates Indira Jaising and Gayatri Singh argued for the petitioner, The Indian Federation of app-based Transport Workers (IFAT). It was argued that at present these workers are not being provided the benefit of social security under any of the labour legislations-organised or unorganised. The counsel for petitioners argued that they are seeking a declaration that gig workers were entitled to protection as unorganised workers.

After hearing arguments in the matter, a bench headed by Justice L. Nageswara Rao issued notice on the petition.

Jaising submitted the petitioner seeks a declaration that the drivers or delivery workers are actually workmen in the classical sense of the word, and emphasised that worldwide for Uber they have been considered as workers. During the hearing, the top court cited the new legislation Social Security Code 2020 passed by Parliament last year has a chapter on the welfare of gig workers.

The counsel submitted that the gig workers under existing law, would fall under the unorganised worker.

The plea, filed through advocate Nupur Kumar, said "The Respondents' companies herein have been claiming that there exists no contract of employment between them and the petitioners and that their relationship with the petitioners are in the nature of partnership. If such a claim were to be accepted, this would be inconsistent with the purpose of social-welfare legislations..."

The plea contended that the respondent companies, which own the apps, exercise complete supervision and control over the manner and method of the work with those who are allowed to register on the said apps. "Denial of the social security to the "gig workers" and the "platform workers" is an affront to the workers' right to life and right against forced labour that are secured by Articles 14, 21 and 23 of the Constitution of India", added the plea.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: indiaNew DelhiUberIndira JaisingThe Supreme CourtGayatri SinghThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-india
Open in App

Related Stories

Navi MumbaiMumbai Crime: Cab Driver Assaulted, Robbed of Rs 62,000 by Fake Passengers on Panvel Trip

InternationalIranian President Calls for Constructive Role of Brics to Halt West Asia Conflict During Talks With PM Modi

MumbaiDiscount On Mumbai Metro Ticket Booking? Uber Integration Brings Seamless Travel via ONDC

LifestyleEid 2026 Date: When Will Saudi Arabia, UAE and India Celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr?

MaharashtraMaharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Unfurls 200-Foot National Flag at Nagpur’s Kasturchand Park

National Realted Stories

National"If you have the guts, answer them": Pawan Khera levels fresh allegations against Assam CM's wife

NationalRs. 200 crores extortion case: Delhi HC reserves order on Leena Maria Paulose's bail in money laundering, extortion case

NationalAnswer questions, don't hide behind police: 'Untraceable' Pawan Khera tells Assam CM

NationalMP Board answer sheets reveal emotional appeals, proposals, bribe offers from students in Gwalior

NationalKarnataka govt urges Maharashtra to have Kannada option in TET