City
Epaper

SC stays felling of trees on Mumbai's Metro Line 4 project

By IANS | Updated: December 2, 2019 19:30 IST

For the second time within two months, the Supreme Court has intervened to stop felling of trees for the Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority' (MMRD) Metro rail projects. On Monday, the apex court stayed, for two weeks, axing of trees on the Metro Line 4 (Wadala to Kasarvadali via Thane). Last month, it had ordered no tree be cut in the Aarey colony forest area for the Metro car shed.

Open in App

Thane resident Rohit Joshi, through advocate Pooja Dhar, filed a plea challenging the Bombay High Court's November 25 order vacating the stay on the felling of trees for the Metro 4 line project to be constructed by the MMRDA. The High Court had vacated the stay passed by a different bench in October, observing that public projects cannot be stalled.

A bench, headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde, asked the counsel for the petitioner if they have challenged the decision of the authority, which approved the felling of the trees for the project. While granting a stay on felling of the trees, the court asked the petitioner's counsel to move the Bombay High Court.

"Counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes to carry out the amendments before the High Court within a period of one week from today. On that assurance, there shall be an injunction restraining the authorities concerned from felling trees for a period of two weeks from today," the top court said.

Joshi contended the permission granted for cutting of the trees was in violation of the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Conservation of Trees Act 1975, which requires public notice by advertising in local newspapers, and fixing notice on the trees, which have been identified for felling, and holding an inquiry. "No such procedure was followed in this case," he said in his plea.

The petitioner contends that the Tree Authority did not consider any public objections before granting permission to fell trees, and that the High Court had erred in not identifying that preventing destruction of ecology is, in fact, of greater public interest, in comparison with the construction of the Metro project.

"Elevated line will result in loss of green cover through the entire corridor of 32 Kms.... Destruction of Mangroves have already begun for construction of a casting yard," he said in his petition.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Bombay High CourtHigh CourtPooja Dhar
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraBombay High Court Orders Husband to Pay ₹3.5 Lakh Monthly Alimony After Hiding ₹1,000-Crore Empire

NationalMadhya Pradesh High Court Grants Divorce to Man, Says False Allegations and Humiliation by Wife Are Mental Cruelty

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Shares Price Drop After Bombay High Court Denies Personal Hearing In SBI Fraud Case

BusinessBig Blow for Anil Ambani In SBI Fraud Case; Bombay HIgh Court Rejects Plea Of Reliance Group Chairman

EntertainmentShilpa Shetty Denies Receiving ₹15 Crore, Threatens Legal Action Over Defamation

National Realted Stories

NationalMassive accidental blast at Srinagar police station; casualties feared, terror angle ruled out

NationalRahul Gandhi’s ‘vote chori’ claim backfired for Congress in Bihar: Assam CM

NationalJuveniles are eligible for anticipatory bail henceforth: Calcutta HC

NationalBihar results: NDA bags 10 out of 11 seats in East Champaran district

National‘MP proud of being a tribal state’: CM Yadav