City
Epaper

SC to hear tomorrow plea against excavation work around Shree Jagannath temple

By ANI | Updated: May 30, 2022 22:25 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday said that it will hear on May 31 a plea challenging the order of the Orissa High Court refusing to restrain the state government from carrying out excavation work around Shree Jagannath temple at Puri, Odisha.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Monday said that it will hear on May 31 a plea challenging the order of the Orissa High Court refusing to restrain the state government from carrying out excavation work around Shree Jagannath temple at Puri, Odisha.

The plea was mentioned before a bench of Justices BR Gavai and Hima Kohli for urgent listing. The bench said it will hear the matter tomorrow.

The plea challenged the order of the division bench of Orissa High Court and alleged illegal excavation and construction work by the Odisha government at Shree Jagannath temple.

The appeal filed in the apex court alleged that the excavation of the area close to the temple wall poses a serious threat to the temple's structural safety. It sought a stay of the operation of the construction work near the temple.

The High Court, while hearing a PIL, had asked the Archeological Survey of India as well as the State government agencies to conduct a joint inspection of the area and submit a report.

The ASI had informed the High Court that there was every possibility of archaeological remains at the heritage site being destroyed due to the excavation work for the corridor.

It had said that the Odisha Bridge Construction Corporation, the PSU which is undertaking the construction, may have destroyed archaeological remains from around the 12th century Jagannath temple by carrying out a deep excavation to build common facilities under the 'Srimandir Parikrama' plan.

It had further submitted that the government had not obtained any permission to carry out the construction work. The State, however, contended that it had obtained all the requisite permission for the construction.

The High court, while taking into note the ASI's report, had directed the state government to file an affidavit by June 20 and fixed June 22 as the next date of hearing.

The appeal in the Supreme Court said that as per Section 19 of the Ancient Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains Act, no person can construct any building within a 100 meters radius protected area and the temple was declared a protected area in 1975, hence such construction is happening at a structure called Meghanad Pacheri which is an integral part of the temple.

It said the state government is trying to construct certain structures by using heavy machinery and has already dug up to 30 feet from the ground level adjacent to the western side of Meghnad Pacheri and added that the equipment used for construction is putting pressure on the foundation of the temple.

Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Pattanaik in 2021 had laid down the foundation stone for the Jagannath Temple corridor project wherein the 75-metre perimeter of the temple was sought to be transformed into a heritage corridor to attract devotees.

'The Srimandir Parikrama project' has been designed to have a wide terraced green landscape and a pedestrian-only pathway.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Naveen PatnaikpuriTempleSupreme CourtHima kohliOrissa high courtHigh court of orissaOdisha high courtAyodhya municipalitySeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiDevendra Fadnavis Disagrees with Abrupt Closure of Mumbai’s Kabutarkhanas, Urges Regulated Measures to Mitigate Health Risks

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

National Realted Stories

NationalLoP Gandhi accuses EC of helping dismantle democracy systematically

NationalShiv Sena-UBT questions PM Modi’s 'friendship' with Trump after tariff hike

NationalBihar BJP renews attack on Prashant Kishor for 2020 election campaign data 'theft'

NationalSC Collegium recommends elevation of a judicial officer as P&H HC judge

NationalAbhishek Banerjee attacks ECI over order for suspension of 4 election officers in Bengal