City
Epaper

Second SC judge recuses from Tejpal's plea for in-camera hearing

By IANS | Updated: January 31, 2022 18:50 IST

New Delhi, Jan 31 A second Supreme Court judge on Monday recused himself from hearing the plea by ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 31 A second Supreme Court judge on Monday recused himself from hearing the plea by Tehelka magazines' former editor Tarun Tejpal against the Bombay High Court, which declined to entertain his application for in-camera hearing of the appeal filed by Goa government against his acquittal in sexual assault case.

Justice U.U. Lalit recused from hearing Tejpal's plea. On January 21, Justice L Nageswara Rao recused from hearing the plea as he had appeared for Goa government, as a lawyer, in 2015. "Please list this before some other court," he said.

Tejpal moved the top court on December 4, last year, challenging the dismissal of his application by the high court. He contended that every party has a right to place forth their case in the best possible manner. The plea argued that it would not be fair, if lawyers have to curtail their submissions against the backdrop that some publication may publish something, without exercising due care.

Citing a recent order by the High Court which passed directions for in-camera hearings in cases under the Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act, Tejpal sought an in-camera proceeding in his matter too.

In May, last year, the trial court acquitted Tejpal of all charges levelled against him, including wrongful confinement, assault with intent to outrage modesty, sexual harassment, and rape against his female colleague. The Goa government filed an appeal challenging his acquittal and Tejpal moved the high court with an application seeking in-camera hearing of the matter.

The appeal contended that trial court order was influenced by extraneous and inadmissible material and by testimonies and graphic details of the past sexual history of the victim, which is prohibited by law.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtBombay High CourtTarun Tejpal
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalHarish Rana Case: SC Praises Family’s Organ Donation Decision After Granting Passive Euthanasia

MumbaiMumbai Teen Died In 2009 Train Accident, Family Awarded Rs 8 Lakh Compensation In 2026

NationalCrop Ruined by Parrots is 'Damage by Wild Animals', says HC; Gives Relief

MumbaiBombay High Court Orders ₹50,000 Compensation Each for Lawyer, Ex-Serviceman Over Police Misconduct

MumbaiLadki Bahin Yojana: Stop Scheme If No Funds for Pension, Says Bombay HC

National Realted Stories

NationalMaharashtra govt mulling to raise OBC non-creamy layer cap to Rs 15 lakh

National'ULB poll results reflect faith in Sukhu government': Congress MLA Kewal Singh Pathania

NationalDGCA directs OEM to inspect fuel control switch in presence of its officers for Air India

NationalCMFRI study reveals complex mating patterns in Indian Squid

NationalAyushman Bharat Digital Mission strengthening India's national digital health ecosystem: JP Nadda