City
Epaper

'Some say liquor in small quantity is good', SC refuses plea for warning labels on bottles

By IANS | Updated: September 23, 2022 14:30 IST

New Delhi, Sep 23 The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a plea seeking regulation on the ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 23 The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a plea seeking regulation on the production, distribution, and consumption of intoxicating drinks and drugs in the national capital and also health warning stickers on liquor bottles alike cigarette packets.

The plea filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay sought a direction to the government to publish health warnings on liquor bottles similar to the criteria adopted for warning signs on cigarette packets and the same should be advertised through electronic, print, and social media.

Upadhyay contended before a bench headed by Chief Justice U.U. Lalit that he would only press for limited prayer to have warning labels on alcohol bottles, as they are harmful. He further argued that a little indulgence in this matter will benefit the youth and pressed for warning labels on the bottles.

The bench, also comprising Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Indira Banerjee, said that there are thoughts and counter thoughts, and some people say liquor taken in small quantities is good for health and nowhere similar things are said about cigarettes. The bench expressed its disinclination in entertaining the petition. "Either you withdraw this or we will dismiss it. This is a policy matter," said the bench.

Upadhyay urged the top court to grant him the liberty to move the Law Commission in the matter. The bench said, "No, we will only allow withdrawal". Upadhyay withdrew his petition.

The plea had also sought a direction to the Delhi government to carry out a 'health impact assessment' and 'environment impact assessment' of production, distribution and consumption of the intoxicating drinks and drugs in the spirit of Articles 21 and 47 of the Constitution.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Indira BanerjeeLaw CommissionSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

National Realted Stories

NationalNine Indian govt officers to gain specialised academic knowledge in Japan

NationalMohan Yadav, Assembly Speaker Narendra Tomar pay tribute to MP's 1st CM Ravishankar Shukla on his birth anniversary; Cong absent

NationalTrinamool leader's murder: Four arrested in West Bengal's Hooghly

NationalDelhi Police busts international drug syndicate; two foreign nationals arrested in Govindpuri

NationalOver Rs 3.77 lakh crore transferred directly to farmers' accounts under PM-Kisan scheme: Minister