City
Epaper

Three-judge SC bench to hear plea against Hindu Succession Act's Sec 15

By IANS | Updated: February 1, 2022 19:05 IST

New Delhi, Feb 1 A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court will examine the constitutional validity of Section ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 1 A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court will examine the constitutional validity of Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

On Monday, a bench of Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Surya Kant said the matter should be heard by a three-judge bench and scheduled the matter for hearing on February 10.

"List the petition on February 10, 2022. Learned counsel for the parties would be at liberty to file their written submissions before the next date of listing and a copy of the submissions in the PDF format," its order said.

The plea, filed by Kamal Anant Khopkar through advocate-on-record Manju Jetley, has argued that the Act's Section 15, discriminates in connection with the devolution of property in case of a woman dying intestate, when compared with the devolution of property of a man dying intestate.

The plea contended that discrimination in the provisions is only based on gender and not on family ties.

Section 15 of the Act details on general rules of succession for Hindu females and sub-section (1), says that property of a female Hindu dying intestate shall devolve according to rules set out in Section 16, which deals with the order of succession and manner of distribution among heirs of a Hindu female.

These list firstly, the sons and daughters (including the children of any pre-deceased son or daughter) and the husband, secondly, the heirs of the husband, thirdly, upon the mother and father, fourthly, the heirs of the father, and lastly, upon the heirs of the mother.

In 2019, the court had issued notice on the petition noting that it raised an important question on gender equality.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtJustices d.y. chandrachudSurya KantManju jetley
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

National Realted Stories

NationalBJP slams NCP-SP MLA Jitendra Awhad for anti-Sanatan Dharma remarks

NationalSpeaking Pakistan's language: BJP slams Mani Shankar Aiyar over remarks on diplomatic efforts

NationalCentre cuts prices of 35 essential medicines

NationalJ&K marks six years of Article 370 abrogation with developmental gains, democratic revival

NationalHuge arms recoveries help in restoring peace in Manipur