City
Epaper

Umpire's 'no-ball blunder' comes to light after Australia wrap up Ashes series 4-1

By IANS | Updated: January 8, 2026 13:25 IST

Sydney, Jan 8 An umpiring error has come to light following Harry Brook’s dismissal in England’s second innings, ...

Open in App

Sydney, Jan 8 An umpiring error has come to light following Harry Brook’s dismissal in England’s second innings, which reportedly stemmed from an illegal delivery by Australian all-rounder Beau Webster that went unnoticed.

On Day 4 of the Sydney Test, with England at 219/3, Webster trapped Brook lbw for 42, a wicket that handed the tourists a slender 36-run lead. However, replays later showed Webster had overstepped, with his back foot clearly outside the return crease. Third umpire Kumar Dharmasena failed to detect the no-ball, according to Code Sports.

Under the laws, the third umpire is required to check every wicket-taking delivery for front and back-foot no-balls. Had the infringement been identified, Brook should have been recalled to the crease.

England’s innings unravelled soon after Brook’s dismissal, yielding just 124 further runs and setting Australia a modest target of 160. The hosts chased it down comfortably to seal a 4–1 series victory.

On Day 5, Australia opener Jake Weatherald was also reprieved after appearing to edge a delivery from England seamer Brydon Carse. Dharmasena ruled there was insufficient evidence of a clear spike on Snicko, a decision that visibly frustrated Carse and left captain Ben Stokes furious as he challenged the on-field umpire.

Former England captain Michael Vaughan said such errors are unacceptable in the modern game, stressing that technology should prevent mistakes of this magnitude.

"I don’t think England will use these kind of decisions as an excuse for why they haven’t won the Ashes but fundamentally, we’re in 2026. With all the technology, that shouldn’t happen. To think there’s been some back foot no balls bowled on wickets and nothing has been done; it’s not acceptable in this era.

"That shouldn’t happen. That is a big moment. Are the third umpires looking for a back foot no-ball or not? They're the officiators of the game; they should know every rule. It’s a no ball, it should have been called,” he told News Corp.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai-Pune Expressway Traffic Update: Yashwantrao Chavan Highway To Be Closed On April 23–24; Check Diversions

InternationalTrump unilaterally extends ceasefire despite Iran staying away from talks

InternationalUAE asserts financial strength with USD 2 trillion in assets despite regional war strains

InternationalRenewed calls for global action against terrorism on Pahalgam terror attack anniversary

EntertainmentMom-to-be Deepika Padukone back on set post pregnancy announcement, director Punit Malhotra shares pic

Other Sports Realted Stories

Other SportsShiva Narwal and Chirag Sharma win gold and bronze 10m Air Pistol, Panaah wins silver in 10m Air Rifle

Other SportsVenus Williams loses 10 matches in a row with defeat at the Madrid Open

Other SportsIPL 2026: Abhishek’s century powers SRH to third spot with 47-run win over DC

Other SportsTennis: Jannik Sinner focuses on 'performing well' in Madrid Open

Other SportsIPL 2026: Boost for Mumbai Indians as Will Jacks joins squad ahead of CSK clash