City
Epaper

Delhi HC adjourns hearing bail plea of Satyendar Jain and his aides

By IANS | Updated: February 13, 2023 19:20 IST

New Delhi, Feb 13 The Delhi High Court on Monday adjourned hearing in bail plea of jailed Delhi ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 13 The Delhi High Court on Monday adjourned hearing in bail plea of jailed Delhi Minister Satyendar Jain and co-accused Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case.

On February 8, advocate Sushil Kumar Gupta appearing for Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain, the two aides of the Minister had concluded his submissions before a bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma.

He had contended that in the present case, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) is just investigating the predicate offence and not the money laundering case, and that the ED had presumptively established a case of disproportionate assets (DA), but this could not be their case because the agency must first establish the existence of a scheduled offence.

Citing the Vijay Madan Lal Judgment of the apex court, Gupta had argued that the role that the ED has given to his clients (Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain) in the current case should be different from the CBI case, but the ED has accused them under the same rules.

He had further argued that the "proceeds of crime is the core" that needed to be established in the present case by the ED to have a case against his clients.

Earlier, Gupta, on behalf of his clients, had said: "We have been roped in because the company, as per the Enforcement Directorate, belonged to Satyendar Jain."

He had added: "We are stating that it is our company, not Satyendar Jain's."

The Jains' counsel had said that Satyendar Jain has nothing to do with the company and that all the companies belong to them.

Special Judge Vikas Dhull had denied the two bail on November 17 last year.

Earlier, Satyendar Jain's counsel N. Hariharan had asked how is the minister involved in the present case and how is he related to it as the money belonged to Ankush and Vaibhav Jain, which came back to their account without any premium.

"My (Satyendar Jain's) assets before and after the cheque period remained the same," he had said.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Dinesh kumar sharmaSatyendar JainEnforcement DirectorateThe Delhi High CourtDepartment of economic affairs of finance ministryRevenue and department of economic affairsGovernment of india, directorate of enforcementFormer enforcement directorateIncome tax, enforcement directorateEnforcement of directorateAs enforcement directorate
Open in App

Related Stories

NashikAshok Kharat Case: ED Investigates Financial Links, No One Will Be Spared, Says CM Fadnavis

BusinessAnil Ambani’s Reliance Power Shares Jump Nearly 7% on Volume Spike; Outperform Sensex Amid ED Probe

MumbaiMumbai: Retired Bank Manager, Family Held in ‘Digital Arrest’ for 35 Days; ₹1.83 Crore Lost to Cyber Fraud in Mulund

BusinessED Issues Fresh Summons to Anil Ambani; Reliance Group Chairman Asked to Appear on February 26

BusinessAnil Ambani Undertakes Not to Leave India as SC Orders Fair Probe by CBI, ED in ₹40,000 Crore Bank Fraud Case

Politics Realted Stories

PoliticsTamil Nadu Polls: "Our goal is to form government again," says EPS

PoliticsNitish Kumar to take oath as Rajya Sabha MP today

Politics"Wouldn't be surprising if BJP-led NDA reaches triple digits": Assam CM on record polling in state

Politics"Privilege of my life to enter Parliament under leadership of PM Modi": Parth Ajit Pawar

Politics"Historic...watershed moment in Assam's history": Himanta Sarma lauds highest turnout in assembly polls