City
Epaper

Did Punjab bureaucrats mislead High Court on nazool land meant for poor?

By IANS | Updated: January 6, 2023 22:35 IST

Chandigarh, Jan 6: Some bureaucrats while posted as Deputy Commissioners (DCs) heading the administration of districts in Punjab, apparently ...

Open in App

Chandigarh, Jan 6: Some bureaucrats while posted as Deputy Commissioners (DCs) heading the administration of districts in Punjab, apparently misled the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding the retrieval of ‘nazool land allotted to Dalits in 1956 that was later passed over to the rich in violation of the law.

The ‘nazool land' initially belonged to Muslims who left India at the time of partition in 1947. This evacuee property was first taken over by the Government of India. In 1956 the Central government framed rules for its allotment to the poor landless Dalits and transferred about 2334 acres to the Punjab government.

A division bench of the High Court headed by the then Chief Justice Jasbir Singh ordered in May 2013 that ‘nazool land' spread all over the state, should be retrieved from illegal occupants. It also recommended action against them as per law after giving them an opportunity for a hearing.

This order of the High Court germinated from a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in 2011 by a Dalit Soma Singh resident of Harpalpur village in Rajpura tehsil of Patiala district.

He contended that a scheduled caste's cooperative society in his village, allotted about 29 bighas of land for cultivation, was selling it to Non-Dalits for real estate purposes violating the law governing the ‘nazool land.' The law provided that such land could not be alienated by the allottees or transferred in the name of a Non-Dalit or mortgaged. It could only be inherited by the family of the allottee.

As the litigation progressed, a Special Secretary to the Punjab government, S.S. Khaira informed the court in December 2012 that all the DCs had been instructed to identify ‘nazool land,' issue show cause notices to the illegal occupants and finally to retrieve it.

During the subsequent hearings, the High Court was told that the retrieval process was underway on 1725 acres in Kapurthala, 381 acres in Patiala, 70 acres in Fatehgarh Sahib, 152 acres in SAS Nagar (Mohali), 4 acres in Sangrur and 4 Kanals in Bathinda. Later, all the DCs reported on different dates that the land had been retrieved. The High Court disposed of the matter on the basis of the information provided to it.

However, an RTI activist Akash Verma in February 2020, sought information from the Financial Commissioner Revenue (FCR) about the status of ‘nazool land' citing the High Court order of 2013. He asked whether the Dalits were re-allotted the retrieved land.

Interestingly, the FCR replied that the state headquarters has no record of the retrieved land. The RTI activist was advised to contact respective DCs for the required information.

When DCs were requested to provide information, most of them did not reply, while SAS Nagar (Mohali) DC surprisingly informed that nazool land did not exist in his district. Hence the question of retrieving it does not arise. The previous DC of the same district reported earlier that 152 acres of ‘nazool land' stood identified.

In a separate but related matter, the Urban Evacuee Nazool Land falling within municipal limits of cities, in the illegal possession of Dalits and Non-Dalits, was sought to be legalised in the name of occupants. The Punjab government amended the rules and invited applications in 2001 from all occupants to regularise their possession.

The government had asked the illegal occupants to deposit the price of land, as fixed by it, after which they would become owners legally. But 22 years have passed, and the applications of lakhs of illegal occupants remain buried. In case the move had fructified, the government could have earned crores of rupees by way of stamp duty as well.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: HarpalpurchandigarhHigh CourtHaryana High CourtJasbir SinghChandigarh union territoryHong kong high courtAkash vermaMayor of south delhi municipal corporationKenyan high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalMadhya Pradesh High Court Grants Divorce to Man, Says False Allegations and Humiliation by Wife Are Mental Cruelty

NationalHaryana IPS Officer Suicide: Family Allows Post-Mortem in Chandigarh, Cremation at 4 PM

NationalHaryana: Senior IPS Officer Commits Suicide at Chandigarh Home

EntertainmentShilpa Shetty Denies Receiving ₹15 Crore, Threatens Legal Action Over Defamation

NationalKerala HC: Consensual Relationship Turning Sour Not Sexual Assault, Bail Granted to Accused

Politics Realted Stories

NationalGujarat Cabinet Expansion: BJP President JP Nadda To Discuss Cabinet Reshuffle With CM Bhupendra Patel Today

NationalPrashant Kishor's Jan Suraaj Party Announces List of 51 Candidates for Bihar Assembly Elections 2025

MumbaiAmeet Satam Appointed As Mumbai BJP President Ahead of BMC Polls

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'