City
Epaper

HC will pronounce verdict today on Sameer Wankhede's father plea against Nawab Malik

By ANI | Updated: November 18, 2021 13:20 IST

The Bombay High Court will resume hearing and is likely to pronounce a verdict Thursday in a case filed by Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) Zonal Director Sameer Wankhede's father Dhyandev K Wankhede against Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik.

Open in App

The Bombay High Court will resume hearing and is likely to pronounce a verdict Thursday in a case filed by Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) Zonal Director Sameer Wankhede's father Dhyandev K Wankhede against Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik.

"Bombay High Court to resume the matter on Sameer Wankhede's father petition demanding that I should not be allowed to tweet (on his son); judge to pronounce verdict at 2:15 pm today," said Malik.

However, he clarified that the "Main petition of Rs 1.25 crore (defamation) will be heard later."

Dhyandev K Wankhede has filed a police complaint against Malik under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly making false accusations regarding his family's caste.

The complaint was filed with the Assistant Commissioner of Police of the Oshiwara division in Mumbai.

" Accused Nawab Malik also in one interview with newspaper Sakal made a false and derogatory statement against myself and my family members regarding our caste. Not only that, on several occasions, while doing interaction with the print media as well as the electronic media, the said accused Nawab Malik has made derogatory statements and allegations against me and my family regarding our caste. That I have the footage/videos of said press/news events as well as concerning news articles. That I will produce the same as and when required by you while conducting the investigation of the present matter," read the written complaint to the Assistant Commissioner of Police.

"I say that you please take cognizance of my above-mentioned complaint and register FIR against the accused under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act 1989 and under sections 503, 508, 499 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under sections 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000," it added.

Earlier, Malik had alleged that Sameer Wankhede was born a Muslim but he forged documents, including a caste certificate, to pass off as a Scheduled Caste (SC) person to get recruitment under quota after clearing the UPSC exams.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Nawab MalikBombay High CourtNarcotics Control BureauJustice of bombay high courtBombay highSameer wankhedeNarcotics bureauCentral narcotics control bureau
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraBombay HC on Potholes: Compensation for Deaths and Injuries to Be Deducted From Salaries of Civic Officials

MumbaiBombay HC Sets Up Expert Panel To Tackle Badlapur’s Chaotic Growth, Pushes For Planned Urban Development

MumbaiBombay High Court Receives Second Bomb Threat; Police Search Finds Nothing Suspicious

EntertainmentThe Ba**ds of Bollywood: Did Aryan Khan Troll Sameer Wankhede in His Netflix Series? Here's What Netizens Say

MumbaiBombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Anil Ambani In Loan Fraud Case; Stops Bank Of Baroda From Taking Action

Politics Realted Stories

MumbaiAmeet Satam Appointed As Mumbai BJP President Ahead of BMC Polls

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray