City
Epaper

'If truth is on your side': SC refuses stay on dismissal of cop who probed Ishrat Jahan encounter

By IANS | Updated: September 28, 2022 17:45 IST

New Delhi, Sep 28 The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to stay the Centre's order dismissing Gujarat cadre ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 28 The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to stay the Centre's order dismissing Gujarat cadre IPS officer Satish Chandra Verma, who had assisted the CBI in its probe into the alleged fake encounter of Ishrat Jahan in Gujarat.

A bench of Justices K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy declined to interfere with the Delhi High Court's order, which refused to stay the dismissal order. "Consequently, we are not inclined to stay or interdict the order of dismissal dated 30.08.2022 at this stage," said the high court, asking the Centre to file a reply in the matter within eight weeks and rejoinder within four weeks thereafter, and scheduled the hearing on January 24 next year.

Verma's lawyer argued before the apex court that the high court relied on an unproven transcript of an interview downloaded from YouTube and his client does not have any knowledge who made the transcript and the CD. He added that it was the only evidence for which he was dismissed.

The top court was also informed that another officer has been appointed in place of Verma after his dismissal.

It said that now somebody else has been put in charge and it can advance the hearing in the matter in November.

Verma's counsel said his client has put in 38 years of service and urged the court to extend the stay and let the high court decide.

Justice Joseph said the court needs to balance everything and "you talked about your honour, prestige. But if the truth is on your side, you will have your day in the court".

He added if justice is on your side, you will succeed. Verma's counsel replied: "Let me retire with honour."

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, submitted that he does not object to the advancement of the date but added that there is another side to the story.

After hearing arguments, the top court said the matter should be listed before the high court on November 22, and asked the court to decide it as early as possible. The top court clarified that it has not expressed anything on the merits of the case.

Verma was dismissed from service on August 30, ahead of his superannuation on September 30. The charges against him include interacting "with public media" when he was chief vigilance officer of the North Eastern Electric Power Corporation, Shillong.

He had probed the 2004 Ishrat Jahan case between April 2010 and October 2011 and on his investigation report, a special investigation team held it was a fake encounter. Verma had moved the apex court after the high court allowed the Home Ministry to take action against him in view of a departmental inquiry, which proved the charges against him.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Satish chandra vermaCBISupreme CourtHrishikesh RoySeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

MumbaiMumbai: CBI Brings Back Key Accused Kubbawala Mustafa from UAE in ₹256 Crore Drug Racket Case

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray

NationalAssembly Bypoll Results 2025: AAP Wins Visavadar and Ludhiana West Seats; Congress Wrests Nilambur Seat in Kerala