City
Epaper

'Is there no other competent person', SC to Centre on ED Director's extension

By IANS | Updated: May 3, 2023 22:40 IST

New Delhi, May 3 The Supreme Court on Wednesday shot a volley of questions at the Centre in ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 3 The Supreme Court on Wednesday shot a volley of questions at the Centre in connection with the third extension of service given to ED Director Sanjay Kumar Mishra.

A bench headed by Justice B.R. Gavai asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, "is there no competent person in the entire agency and can one person be so indispensable?"

The bench, also comprising justices Vikram Nath and Sanjay Karol, queried Mehta, "What will happen to the agency post-2023 when he does retire?"

The top court, in a 2021 judgment, had said that any extension of tenure granted to officers holding the post of director after attaining the age of superannuation should be for a short period, adding that no further extension will be given to Mishra.

Mehta submitted that Mishra's extension was vital for India's evaluation by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the next peer review of India's legislation on money laundering is to take place in 2023.

Mehta contended that to ensure that the country's rating does not go down, continuity of the leadership in ED is crucial, added that "though no one is indispensable, in such cases continuity is required".

Mehta said, "We are not dealing with individuals, but with the performance of an entire country."

Mehta also said that he has a serious objection with respect to the petitions filed by political persons whose party's senior functionaries are under investigation by the ED, saying that they have no locus standi in the matter.

Mehta said in one of the cases, the authorities had to get a cash counting machine because so much cash was recovered.

To this, the bench said that can a person being a member of a political party be a ground for not permitting him to file a petition?

The top court will continue hearing the matter on May 8.

The petitioners have challenged the third extension given to ED Director S.K. Mishra, and also the CVC Amendment Act 2021.

The Centre has told the Supreme Court that the PIL challenging the extension of Mishra has been filed with the intention of protecting Congress leaders, who are facing money laundering charges.

Pointing at the petitioners - Randeep Singh Surjewala (Congress), Jaya Thakur (Congress), Saket Gokhale and Mahua Moitra (both Trinamool Congress) - the affidavit said the eminent leaders of these parties are under the scanner of ED.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtFinancial Action Task ForceSanjay kumar mishraTushar MehtaindiaDisney IndiaNew DelhiAll India Majlis E Ittehadul MuslimeenCommunist Party Of India MarxistIndia TodayAir Asia IndiaAsia IndiaFifa U 17 World Cup IndiaAll India Football Federation
Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIranian President Calls for Constructive Role of Brics to Halt West Asia Conflict During Talks With PM Modi

LifestyleEid 2026 Date: When Will Saudi Arabia, UAE and India Celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr?

MaharashtraMaharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Unfurls 200-Foot National Flag at Nagpur’s Kasturchand Park

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

NationalAhmedabad Traffic Update for India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup Final: Check Road Closures and Alternate Routes Near Narendra Modi Stadium

Politics Realted Stories

Politics'Congress took contract for political assassination of CM Sarma, his family': BJP's Shehzad Poonawalla

PoliticsUnion Minister Pralhad Joshi alleges 'Love Jihad' conspiracy in Karnataka

Politics"May go to the tribunal": West Bengal LoP Suvendu Adhikari on SIR voters deletion

PoliticsCampaigning ends for assembly polls in Assam, Keralam, Puducherry; leaders make last-ditch efforts to woo voters

PoliticsSP Chief Akhilesh Yadav questions use of 2011 census for Women's Reservation Bill, asks "What is the rush?"