City
Epaper

'Is there no other competent person', SC to Centre on ED Director's extension

By IANS | Updated: May 3, 2023 22:40 IST

New Delhi, May 3 The Supreme Court on Wednesday shot a volley of questions at the Centre in ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 3 The Supreme Court on Wednesday shot a volley of questions at the Centre in connection with the third extension of service given to ED Director Sanjay Kumar Mishra.

A bench headed by Justice B.R. Gavai asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, "is there no competent person in the entire agency and can one person be so indispensable?"

The bench, also comprising justices Vikram Nath and Sanjay Karol, queried Mehta, "What will happen to the agency post-2023 when he does retire?"

The top court, in a 2021 judgment, had said that any extension of tenure granted to officers holding the post of director after attaining the age of superannuation should be for a short period, adding that no further extension will be given to Mishra.

Mehta submitted that Mishra's extension was vital for India's evaluation by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the next peer review of India's legislation on money laundering is to take place in 2023.

Mehta contended that to ensure that the country's rating does not go down, continuity of the leadership in ED is crucial, added that "though no one is indispensable, in such cases continuity is required".

Mehta said, "We are not dealing with individuals, but with the performance of an entire country."

Mehta also said that he has a serious objection with respect to the petitions filed by political persons whose party's senior functionaries are under investigation by the ED, saying that they have no locus standi in the matter.

Mehta said in one of the cases, the authorities had to get a cash counting machine because so much cash was recovered.

To this, the bench said that can a person being a member of a political party be a ground for not permitting him to file a petition?

The top court will continue hearing the matter on May 8.

The petitioners have challenged the third extension given to ED Director S.K. Mishra, and also the CVC Amendment Act 2021.

The Centre has told the Supreme Court that the PIL challenging the extension of Mishra has been filed with the intention of protecting Congress leaders, who are facing money laundering charges.

Pointing at the petitioners - Randeep Singh Surjewala (Congress), Jaya Thakur (Congress), Saket Gokhale and Mahua Moitra (both Trinamool Congress) - the affidavit said the eminent leaders of these parties are under the scanner of ED.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtFinancial Action Task ForceSanjay kumar mishraTushar MehtaindiaDisney IndiaNew DelhiAll India Majlis E Ittehadul MuslimeenCommunist Party Of India MarxistIndia TodayAir Asia IndiaAsia IndiaFifa U 17 World Cup IndiaAll India Football Federation
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Jump 3% Today as Telecom Stock Rises 75% in Three Months Amid Strong Market Momentum

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise 2% as Global Brokerage Sees 36% Upside, Maintains ‘Buy’ Rating

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Jumps 5% in a Single Day After Strong Q2 Results; Stock Hits ₹10

MumbaiMumbai: 90,000 Stray Dogs, Only 8 Shelters - City Faces Crunch After SC Relocation Order

CricketIndia vs South Africa 2025 Schedule: Full List of Matches, Dates, Venues and Fixtures

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraBMC Elections 2025: Devendra Fadnavis Says Clarity on Seat-Sharing Will Emerge in Two Days

NationalBJP Candidate Satish Kumar Leading Over Tejashwi Yadav in Raghopur Assembly Constituency

NationalBihar Assembly Election Results 2025: Tejashwi Yadav Leads, Tej Pratap Trails in Early Trends

NationalTarn Taran Assembly By-Election 2025: 23.05% Voter Turnout Recorded Till 11 AM in Punjab By-Poll

MaharashtraWho Is Akshaya Naik? Shetkari Kamgar Paksha Named Mayoral Candidate of Alibag