City
Epaper

Mumbai riots: SC seeks Maha response on compensation paid to families of missing people

By IANS | Updated: August 30, 2022 22:00 IST

New Delhi, Aug 30 The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought response from the Maharashtra government whether it has ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 30 The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought response from the Maharashtra government whether it has paid compensation to legal heirs of 168 people, who were on the missing list during the 1992-93 communal riots in Mumbai.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, A.S. Oka and Vikram Nath asked the state government to clarify what it meant by payment paid to heirs of victims and asked it to file an affidavit in 2 weeks. Taking into consideration a chart before it, the top court said 900 people had died in the violence and 168 persons have gone missing.

It also asked the state government to specify the time lapse between the incident and the payment of compensation, and whether 168 people, on the missing list, were included among the 900 identified victims.

The bench further queried the state government to bring on record whether any compensation was paid for the loss of property, and also specify the time lapse between the incident and the payment of compensation.

It said after completion of seven years, the families of people who have gone missing must get compensation. The apex court was hearing a batch of petitions in connection with the payment of compensation to the Mumbai riots victims.

A commission headed by Justice B.N. Srikrishna, retired Supreme Court judge, which probed the Mumbai riots, had filed its report in 1998.

The apex court, in February 2020, had asked the Maharashtra government to apprise it on action taken against the police officers indicted by the commission.

The commission's report indicted leaders of some political parties and police officers. A lawyer, appearing for one of the petitioners before the top court pressed for the implementation of the recommendations made in the commission's report.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Sanjay Kishan KaulSupreme CourtVikram nathSanjay kishanSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

NationalCryptocurrency Needs To Be Regulated, Banning Not an Option, Says Supreme Court

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray

NationalAssembly Bypoll Results 2025: AAP Wins Visavadar and Ludhiana West Seats; Congress Wrests Nilambur Seat in Kerala