City
Epaper

Ordinance row: SC issues notice to Centre on Delhi government’s plea

By IANS | Updated: July 10, 2023 18:55 IST

New Delhi, July 10 The Supreme Court on Monday sought response of the Centre on the Delhi government’s ...

Open in App

New Delhi, July 10 The Supreme Court on Monday sought response of the Centre on the Delhi government’s plea challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance brought by it on control of services in the national capital in wake of the apex court order.

A bench of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justices P.S. Narasimha directed that Lt Governor of Delhi will also be added as a party in the matter.

“We issue notice. Make it returnable after two weeks. LG of Delhi be impleaded as a party respondent and let the plea be amended accordingly," it said.

The top court said that it will consider on July 17, the question of interim stay on ordinance as well as on LG's decision to terminate over 400 consultants who were appointed by the Delhi government.

On Monday, the Supreme Court declined to pass any interim relief in the plea filed by the AAP-led Delhi government.

Earlier on Wednesday, the Services Department of the Delhi government issued a directive, instructing all departments to halt the engagement of advisors, fellows and consultants .The order said appointments can no longer be made without obtaining prior approval from the Lt Governor.

The Centre had on May 19 promulgated the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance, 2023, to create a National Capital Civil Service Authority for transfer and posting of Group-A officers in Delhi. The Ordinance was brought after a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court had granted control over services in Delhi excluding police, public order and land to the elected government. Thereafter, Delhi's AAP government had moved the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Ordinance, saying it violates the scheme of federal, democratic governance entrenched for the NCTD in Article 239AA and is manifestly arbitrary, and sought an immediate stay.

On May 20, the Centre had also moved the Supreme Court seeking review of its May 11 judgment.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: LgUs Supreme CourtJudge Of The Supreme CourtSupreme CourtThe Supreme CourtBench Of The Supreme CourtUnited States Supreme CourtLg UplusLg ElectronicsMaldives Supreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

InternationalDonald Trump Signs Order Imposing 10% Tariffs on All Countries After US Supreme Court Ruling; How Much Tariff Will India Pay Now?

MumbaiMumbai: Retired Bank Manager, Family Held in ‘Digital Arrest’ for 35 Days; ₹1.83 Crore Lost to Cyber Fraud in Mulund

InternationalDonald Trump's Global Tariffs Illegal : US Supreme Court Deals Major Blow to President

EntertainmentNeeraj Pandey Drops ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ Title; Supreme Court Closes Case

Politics Realted Stories

PoliticsTelangana BJP chief Ramchander Rao placed under house arrest ahead of protest over Women's Reservation Bill

Politics"They lack intent to support transformative reforms": AP Dy CM Pawan Kalyan slams opposition after women's quota bill fails in Lok Sabha

PoliticsBJP responsible for failure of Women's Reservation Bill: KTR

Politics"Insult to all the women": BJP's PVN Madhav slams Congress, demands Rahul Gandhi's resignation after women's quota bill fails in Lok Sabha

Politics"People ready for change": AIADMK candidate Saravanan seeks support for 'Two Leaves' in Tamil Nadu