City
Epaper

SC criticises bail plea under guise of challenge to PMLA in money laundering matters

By IANS | Updated: May 30, 2023 18:40 IST

New Delhi, May 30 The Supreme Court on Tuesday criticised the methodology adopted by the accused in money ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 30 The Supreme Court on Tuesday criticised the methodology adopted by the accused in money laundering cases, where they file pleas under Article 32 against a summons or apply for bail questioning the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

A vacation bench headed by Justice Bela M. Trivedi said such petitions against the PMLA, in the process seeking consequential reliefs, amounts to bypassing other forum available to the petitioners.

Citing the Vijay Madanlal judgment, the bench, also comprising justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, observed that despite this judgment, a trend is prevalent that petitions filed are filed under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of some sections and provisions of the PMLA, which has been decided, and then seek consequential relief.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Enforcement Directorate (ED), vehemently objected to the maintainability of the pleas and requested the court to record some observations in the order against such petitions.

Mehta vehemently argued that there is a trend - challenge law's constitutionality and then get a no coercive action order, which is anticipatory bail - and added, "people are being approached that instead of asking for anticipatory bail challenge the vires of the legislation".

Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, also representing the ED, agreed with Mehta's submission.

The law officers made these submissions after senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, representing one of the petitioners, sought court's permission to withdraw the plea with liberty to approach the high court for bail.

The top court observed that rather than moving the high court to challenge the provisions of the law, the accused were contesting the summons before it and termed this practice "very disturbing".

It made these observations while hearing pleas filed by people being investigated in the alleged liquor scam case in Chhattisgarh.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: S. V. RajupmlaUs Supreme CourtJudge Of The Supreme CourtAbhishek SinghviSupreme CourtThe Supreme CourtBench Of The Supreme CourtUnited States Supreme CourtMaldives Supreme CourtWay Supreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

InternationalDonald Trump Signs Order Imposing 10% Tariffs on All Countries After US Supreme Court Ruling; How Much Tariff Will India Pay Now?

MumbaiMumbai: Retired Bank Manager, Family Held in ‘Digital Arrest’ for 35 Days; ₹1.83 Crore Lost to Cyber Fraud in Mulund

InternationalDonald Trump's Global Tariffs Illegal : US Supreme Court Deals Major Blow to President

EntertainmentNeeraj Pandey Drops ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ Title; Supreme Court Closes Case

Politics Realted Stories

PoliticsPostpone delimitation of constituencies for another 25 years: MK Stalin

PoliticsBengal needs BJP for development, people want end to 'Jungle Raj': MP CM Mohan Yadav

PoliticsDMK's family rule marked by corruption; NDA alliance will form govt in Tamil Nadu on May 4: Piyush Goyal

Politics"Cases involving religious conversion wouldn't be tolerated": Maharashtra CM Fadnavis on Nashik TCS case

PoliticsDelimitation Bill discriminated against South, East, Northeast: Manickam Tagore; alleges RSS capture of institutions