City
Epaper

SC refuses to entertain plea seeking to declare as void election of those facing criminal charges

By IANS | Updated: November 16, 2020 22:10 IST

New Delhi, Nov 16 The Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a PIL seeking to declare 'null ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Nov 16 The Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a PIL seeking to declare 'null & void' elections of those chargesheeted and facing a minimum of 5 years in jail under the charges.

A bench headed by Justice L.N. Rao and comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Ajay Rastogi cited the apex court verdict in 2018, which left it on the Parliament to make laws to ensure that people with pending criminal cases do not get into the political arena.

The bench emphasised that these are legislative issues, which are within the exclusive domain of Parliament and told the petitioner to pursue remedies for implementation of this judgement.

In September 2018, a five-judge Constitution bench had described criminalisation of politics as a termite for the citadel of democracy.

The observation from the bench came on a plea filed by NGO Lok Prahari, which submitted the election of persons facing criminal charges is contrary to rule of law. The petitioner emphasised that it runs contrary to the resolve of the Constitution, which is justice to all, and the issues highlighted in the plea were not the same before the bench which delivered the 2018 verdict. The petitioner also brought court's attention on the section 100 of the Representation of the People (RP) Act, which deals with grounds for declaring election to be void.

The bench replied that these grounds are in context of an election petition and only the Parliament can take up this issue, as prayer in the petition seeking amendment to the Act, could be done though the Parliament.

The top court heard the petitioner for close to 40 minutes. "We do not think we can help you. We will not interfere. But we will give you the liberty to pursue your other remedies as per the directions of the Constitution bench judgment", the bench told the petitioner's counsel.

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalIMD forecast for heavy rain in TN's Mayiladuthurai, Cuddalore

BusinessTaiwan's energy strain justifies shifting chip production to US, says former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger

MumbaiMumbai Road Accident: 70-Year-Old Woman Killed, Another Injured After Truck Hits Scooter in Govandi

CricketRicky Ponting selects his Australia XI for Ashes opener in Perth

BusinessIndia's current account deficit expected to rise to 1.7% of GDP in FY26 due to persistent tariff pressures: Union Bank Report

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraBMC Elections 2025: Devendra Fadnavis Says Clarity on Seat-Sharing Will Emerge in Two Days

NationalBJP Candidate Satish Kumar Leading Over Tejashwi Yadav in Raghopur Assembly Constituency

NationalBihar Assembly Election Results 2025: Tejashwi Yadav Leads, Tej Pratap Trails in Early Trends

NationalTarn Taran Assembly By-Election 2025: 23.05% Voter Turnout Recorded Till 11 AM in Punjab By-Poll

MaharashtraWho Is Akshaya Naik? Shetkari Kamgar Paksha Named Mayoral Candidate of Alibag