City
Epaper

UP moves SC against HC order to remove 'name-and-shame' hoardings

By IANS | Updated: March 11, 2020 19:50 IST

The Uttar Pradesh government on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court, challenging the Allahabad High Court order directing the administration to pull down posters of people allegedly accused in vandalism during the protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in December.

Open in App

New Delhi, March 11 The Uttar Pradesh government on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court, challenging the Allahabad High Court order directing the administration to pull down posters of people allegedly accused in vandalism during the protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in December.

A vacation bench of Justices U.U. Lalit and Aniruddha Bose is scheduled to hear an appeal by the state government on Thursday.

The Allahabad High Court on Monday ordered Lucknow's District Magistrate and Police Commissioner to remove the name-and-shame hoardings with immediate effect, and submit its report on the matter by March 16 which is the next date of hearing.

The court observed that the district administration had no right to put up photographs since this was a violation of one's privacy.

The bench, headed by Chief Justice Govind Mathur, had taken suo motu cognizance of the 100 odd hoardings that were put up on road crossings on Friday and the court heard the case on Sunday even though it was a holiday. The verdict, reserved on Sunday, was delivered on Monday.

Government sources had indicated that the state government would challenge the High Court verdict in the Supreme Court since Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath firmly believed that the name-and-shame hoardings would work as a major deterrent for those who damage public property.

The court had also asked the District Magistrate and Police Commissioner to explain the law under which the hoardings have been put up in Lucknow. The hoardings carried photographs of anti-CAA protesters along with their names, photographs and residential addresses and the accused alleged that the hoardings would make them vulnerable to mob attacks.

The accused have also been asked to pay for the damages to public and private property within a stipulated time, or have their properties attached by the district administration.

( With inputs from IANS )

Open in App

Related Stories

Other Sports3rd Test: Conway, Latham set 462-run target for West Indies on Day 4

EntertainmentFilmmaker Geetu Mohandas calls Kiara Advani’s performance in ‘Toxic’ nothing short of transformative

EntertainmentSonam Bajwa says 'It has been a dream run in 2025' following a successful hattrick in Bollywood

MaharashtraMaharashtra Local Body Election Results 2025: BJP Wins Five Satara District Council Posts As Mahayuti Marches Towards Major Victory

NationalRamadoss urges TN govt to regularise contract nurses, calls arrests ‘unwarranted’

राजनीति Realted Stories

MumbaiWho Is Tejasvee Ghosalkar? Shiv Sena UBT Leader and Former Corporator Joins BJP Ahead of BMC Polls

MaharashtraSanjay Raut Says Sena–MNS Already Together No Need Others Permission

MaharashtraBig Jolt to Sharad Pawar as Salil Deshmukh, Son of Anil Deshmukh, Quits NCP-SP

PoliticsEknath Shinde Issues Strict No-Crossover Order After Meeting Amit Shah; Directive Communicated to All Shiv Sena Leaders

MaharashtraBMC Elections 2025: Devendra Fadnavis Says Clarity on Seat-Sharing Will Emerge in Two Days