City
Epaper

Delhi HC refers dispute between BharatPe, Ashneer Grover to arbitration

By IANS | Updated: August 22, 2024 14:25 IST

New Delhi, Aug 22 The Delhi High Court on Thursday referred a dispute between BharatPe, an online money ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 22 The Delhi High Court on Thursday referred a dispute between BharatPe, an online money transaction platform, and its former managing director Ashneer Grover to a sole arbitrator.

In its plea filed before the Delhi High Court, the fintech company alleged that Grover disclosed confidential information relating to BharatPe on social media platforms, in violation of the employment agreement.

Before the issue reached Delhi HC, responding to BharatPe’s notice to refer the matter to arbitration, Grover agreed on the formation of an arbitral tribunal but disagreed on the name of sole arbitrator.

In an earlier round of litigation, the Delhi High Court imposed a fine of Rs 2 lakh on Grover over blatant violation of earlier orders and assurances made by him to not post on social media defamatory posts against BharatPe.

It had asked Ashneer Grover as well as the officials of the fintech company not to speak in a "unparliamentary" or "defamatory" manner against one another.

The Delhi High Court issued an order restraining Grover from making defamatory and derogatory statements against BharatPe, its office bearers, or officials, and asked Grover to remove his posts, including one calling the SBI Chairperson "petty".

Ashneer and his wife allegedly committed financial irregularities when they were at the helm of the fintech platform.

BharatPe terminated the services of Madhuri Jain, head of controls, after an internal probe found misappropriation of funds that ran into crores during her tenure.

The fintech platform claimed that Grover, his wife, and their relatives were engaged in extensive misappropriation of company funds and grossly abused company money to fund their lavish lifestyles.

Grover had already moved an arbitration plea with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre pleading that the investigation launched against him was illegal because it violated the shareholder agreement and articles of association.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentRandeep Hooda: Archery as a sport instils the values of focus, patience, resilience

FootballTRIONDA, the official match ball for FIFA World Cup 2026, unveiled

Entertainment'Final Destination: Bloodlines' set to make OTT premiere in India, check details

LifestyleToday's Horoscope, October 3, 2025: Check Your Zodiac Signs Predictions, Lucky Numbers and Colours

InternationalPakistan becoming "rogue state" with alarming enforced disappearance, says human rights expert at sidelines of UNHRC session

Business Realted Stories

BusinessBlack Box Partners with Wind River to Accelerate Edge and Cloud Innovation Globally

BusinessMilk, electronics, LPG lead GST-related consumer grievances on NCH

BusinessSensex, Nifty open lower over sustained FII selling

BusinessSelling pressure returns to stocks as Nifty, Sensex down in opening session; Metals, PSU Banks shine

BusinessGovt operationalises record 550 cotton procurement centres across 11 states