City
Epaper

Delhi HC refers dispute between BharatPe, Ashneer Grover to arbitration

By IANS | Updated: August 22, 2024 14:25 IST

New Delhi, Aug 22 The Delhi High Court on Thursday referred a dispute between BharatPe, an online money ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 22 The Delhi High Court on Thursday referred a dispute between BharatPe, an online money transaction platform, and its former managing director Ashneer Grover to a sole arbitrator.

In its plea filed before the Delhi High Court, the fintech company alleged that Grover disclosed confidential information relating to BharatPe on social media platforms, in violation of the employment agreement.

Before the issue reached Delhi HC, responding to BharatPe’s notice to refer the matter to arbitration, Grover agreed on the formation of an arbitral tribunal but disagreed on the name of sole arbitrator.

In an earlier round of litigation, the Delhi High Court imposed a fine of Rs 2 lakh on Grover over blatant violation of earlier orders and assurances made by him to not post on social media defamatory posts against BharatPe.

It had asked Ashneer Grover as well as the officials of the fintech company not to speak in a "unparliamentary" or "defamatory" manner against one another.

The Delhi High Court issued an order restraining Grover from making defamatory and derogatory statements against BharatPe, its office bearers, or officials, and asked Grover to remove his posts, including one calling the SBI Chairperson "petty".

Ashneer and his wife allegedly committed financial irregularities when they were at the helm of the fintech platform.

BharatPe terminated the services of Madhuri Jain, head of controls, after an internal probe found misappropriation of funds that ran into crores during her tenure.

The fintech platform claimed that Grover, his wife, and their relatives were engaged in extensive misappropriation of company funds and grossly abused company money to fund their lavish lifestyles.

Grover had already moved an arbitration plea with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre pleading that the investigation launched against him was illegal because it violated the shareholder agreement and articles of association.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi: Fire Destroys Jhuggis in Shakurpur Basti, No Casualties Reported

InternationalUS Treasury official says sanctions key tool to block adversaries from American financial system

InternationalUS debate heats on minerals, China risk

InternationalNASA sets three priorities for US space strategy: Moon return by 2028, lunar base and commercial expansion

InternationalTornado Warning Issued in Paris, Texas as Storm Spotted Near Pattonville

Business Realted Stories

BusinessPiyush Goyal welcomes Todd McClay ahead of India-New Zealand FTA signing on April 27

BusinessPaytm says app, UPI, QR, Soundbox, Payment Gateway services to continue uninterrupted after RBI action on PPBL

Business"Advancing steadily towards Jio Platforms listing," says Mukesh Ambani as RIL posts Q4 results

BusinessMP CM outlines policy push, procurement boost for farmers in first address

BusinessMoU with Delhi University to boost maritime education: Sonowal