Los Angeles, Nov 17 The Beatles legend Sir Paul McCartney recently went behind the mic to lend his voice to a "silent" track.
The singer-songwriter has performed for the song in protest of the UK government’s AI copyright stance, reports ‘Female First UK’.
The 83-year-old Beatles legend's offering is set to be released as a bonus track on the physical copy of the compilation album ‘Is This What We Want?’, which was initially released digitally earlier this year and contains silent recordings from empty recording studios to highlight the importance of human contribution in music making.
As per ‘Female First UK’, more than 1,000 artistes, including Kate Bush, Damon Albarn and Annie Lennox, contributed to the album.
The tracklisting for ‘Is This What We Want?’ spells out, “The British government must not legalise music theft to benefit AI companies”.
‘Wuthering Heights’ hitmaker Kate, 67, said in a statement, “In the music of the future, will our voices go unheard?”
The physical album will arrive on December 8. All of the profits will benefit the charity Help Musicians, which offers a broad range of support to musicians in times of crisis.
Macca was also among 400 artists who signed an open letter to Britain's Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for their works to protect against AI learning models. The likes of McCartney, Sir Elton John, Dua Lipa, and Coldplay protested the government's proposal to make creatives "opt out" of having their work used to train AI models.
Macca warned that artistes will be ripped off by this approach. He told the BBC earlier this year, “You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song, and they don’t own it, and they don’t have anything to do with it. And anyone who wants can just rip it off”.
Referencing Beatles classic Yesterday, he continued, “The truth is, the money’s going somewhere. Somebody’s getting paid, so why shouldn’t it be the guy who sat down and wrote Yesterday?”
He said in a message for the Labour government, “We are the people, you’re the Government. You’re supposed to protect us. That’s your job. So you know, if you’re putting through a Bill, make sure you protect the creative thinkers, the creative artists, or you’re not going to have them”.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor